High Resistance on CB and 2M Mobile Antennas  | | 
11-06-2009, 09:30 PM
|  | Sandbagger | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Houston
Posts: 7
| | High Resistance on CB and 2M Mobile Antennas I've got a problem that I can't figure out. I have high resistance, by about 20 ohms, on both my CB and 2M mobile antennas. Both are mounted on 3/8x24 stake pocket mounts on my pickup. There are no shorts in the feedline, no shorts on the mounts and they are grounded to the frame with grounding strap. I've also grounded the bed to the frame with grounding strap.
Any recommendations?
__________________ Andrew - MySpace - KD5FHW - "Big Block"
Icom V8000 - Hustler CG-144/MFJ 1414
Cobra 29 LTD Classic - Wilson FGT-3 | 
11-06-2009, 10:36 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Silicon Valley CA, Storm Lake IA
Posts: 1,070
| | OK
So - your seeing a 70 ohm load - rather than 50 ohms?
Hmmm...That works out to a SWR of 1.4 - if I have done my math correctly.
Is that your reading - 1.4?
Its not that bad; have you changed anything in your system?
Check for rust in any joints?
__________________ What gear do I use?
BASE: Icom IC-718 & GAP Titan DX, Yaesu FT-8800R & Diamond X50A, Magnum OmegaForce S45 & IMAX 2000 w/Astatic D104/TUP9.
MOBILE: Galaxy DX99V & Wilson 1000 w/Astatic D104-M2, Yaesu FT-8800R & Diamond NR-770. "...The 444 in San Jose CA; the Central Gold Coast..." | 
11-07-2009, 12:39 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Western Washington
Posts: 1,225
| | What are you using to measure this resistance, and from which exact point to which exact point? How long is the feedline, and what kind is it?
__________________ If you're like everybody else,
you're about average.
73 de K7KBN | 
11-07-2009, 02:16 AM
| | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,075
| | Not all that unusual really. Fairly 'standard' for 1/4 wave antennas (all of them really). If you really want to get them closer to 'perfect', I'm sure it can be done. Expect the usual 'problems', the feed line isn't the answer, and adjusting impedances with a typical commercial antenna isn't exactly the easiest thing to do sometimes (especially with only an SWR meter).
- 'Doc | 
11-07-2009, 09:05 AM
|  | Sandbagger | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Houston
Posts: 7
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob KI6USW OK
So - your seeing a 70 ohm load - rather than 50 ohms?
Hmmm...That works out to a SWR of 1.4 - if I have done my math correctly.
Is that your reading - 1.4? | I haven't really tried to adjust the SWR on the 2M antennas yet, but I have on the CB antenna using the radio's built-in meter and it gets down to an acceptable level, but I have a weird issue where the noise level fades in and out over time, as if it were an internal radio problem. Receiving is no problem on the 2M, however. Quote:
Its not that bad; have you changed anything in your system?
Check for rust in any joints?
| It's all new. I redid everything because I thought it was the feedline and lack of proper grounding. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Beetle What are you using to measure this resistance, and from which exact point to which exact point? | MFJ Analyzer at the radio side. Quote: |
How long is the feedline, and what kind is it?
| CB is about 18ft. and 2M is about 24ft. of RG-8.
__________________ Andrew - MySpace - KD5FHW - "Big Block"
Icom V8000 - Hustler CG-144/MFJ 1414
Cobra 29 LTD Classic - Wilson FGT-3 | 
11-07-2009, 09:53 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Western Washington
Posts: 1,225
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewGS
MFJ Analyzer at the radio side. CB is about 18ft. and 2M is about 24ft. of RG-8. | OK - "typical" R value for a mobile antenna in the 1/4 wavelength area is anywhere from about 25 ohms up to maybe 35 ohms. If your ground plane is adequate for the frequency in use, there shouldn't be a problem. You'll have to adjust the antenna itself for best SWR.
I think the problem might be in the way you're interpreting the readings on the analyzer. That "20 ohms" is NOT a DC resistance, like you'd get with a multimeter (and the way your question was posted, I thought that was what you meant). All antennas have a resistive value and a reactive value. The idea is to reduce the net reactance to zero, at which point the antenna is "resonant": inductive reactance is equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to capacitive reactance, therefore net reactance = zero.
The resistive component will be what it will be. Getting R close to 50 ohms while keeping X close to zero...that's the goal.
__________________ If you're like everybody else,
you're about average.
73 de K7KBN | 
11-07-2009, 11:38 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Nova Scotia,Canada
Posts: 3,113
| | Which stake pockets are you using? If you are using the ones directly behind the cab then the antennas may be too close to the cab to tune right. then again some guys have no problem with using them. Such is the joy of mobile installations. What works for one may not work at all for another. Lots of variables with mobile installs.
__________________ Front/back ratio comes from the antenna. Forward gain comes from the wall socket. | 
11-07-2009, 12:44 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,154
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by QRN Which stake pockets are you using? If you are using the ones directly behind the cab then the antennas may be too close to the cab to tune right. then again some guys have no problem with using them. Such is the joy of mobile installations. What works for one may not work at all for another. Lots of variables with mobile installs. |
My thoughts, too.
You said you were using an analyzer, but you didn't tell us what the readings are? | 
11-07-2009, 02:35 PM
|  | Sandbagger | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Houston
Posts: 7
| |
__________________ Andrew - MySpace - KD5FHW - "Big Block"
Icom V8000 - Hustler CG-144/MFJ 1414
Cobra 29 LTD Classic - Wilson FGT-3 | 
11-07-2009, 04:53 PM
| | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,075
| | I honestly don't think that aluminum is going to make any difference at all. I did notice that there appears to be a plastic(?) insulator under that stake pocket mount. And assuming those 'bolts' on top is what's holding the whole mess in the pocket, I'm also assuming that the connections from feed line to mount are done correctly and the braid really is going to ground at the mount. I don't have any reason to think it isn't, but having never seen that mount before, what do I know about it? Just a thought.
And like someone said, making a compromise between resonance and a little bit of reactance (that 'X' number) to get the 'R' value closer to 50 ohms is pretty common. Try to keep that 'X' number low, and just don't worry about the 'R' value that much. I figure it'll do just fine the way it is. Wanna fiddle with it a bit? Have at it! The ideal is as small an 'X' number as possible, and something at least close to 50 for the 'R' number. It'll never be perfect... for long.
- 'Doc |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:27 PM. |