Go Back   WorldwideDX Amateur Radio Forums > Citizens Band Related > CB Antennas


Amateur Callsign Lookup
Enter Callsign:

Rebuilding a 6 element quad

Like Tree10Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2012, 08:28 PM
6.0 Liter's Avatar
Coax abuse???
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 87
6.0 Liter is on a distinguished road
Default Rebuilding a 6 element quad


I recently came across an old Lightning 6 antenna. The wire and the matching system was beyond repair. The boom and the fiberglass spreaders cleaned up good as new. Got all new hardware to put the boom together, sanded and painted the spreaders, and now need to make a decision. I was in touch with George at the new Lightning antennas location, and I can still get the element kit and matching network. All the wires are premeasured and labled for each element. Just wondering if anyone has run this antenna in its stock form, how does it perform? Wonderingif it could be maximized a bit? Basicly I have a 30 ft boom with 6 hubs, even tho they pass through the boom, I suppose they could be moved to newly drilled holes for differant element spacing if there was somthing to be gained by it. Then new wires could be made up to center it on the frequency of my choosing. Thoughts anyone? Maybe Henry HPSD wants to chime in? All ideas are welcome.
calford49 likes this.
__________________
What goes around, comes back around.........sooner or later!


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2012, 09:45 PM
Marconi's Avatar
Supporting Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston & Corpus Christi
Posts: 3,887
Marconi is on a distinguished road
Default

6.0, drilling more holes in the boom just don't sound like a good idea to me. How are you ever going to know if it does better or not, modifying it that way?

Did you order the parts?
__________________
Marconi's YouTube Channel
We're just lucky that Mother Nature doesn't require our antenna systems to be perfect in order to work our radio.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2012, 10:53 PM
Robb's Avatar
Yup
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Silicon Valley CA, Storm Lake IA
Posts: 7,837
Robb is on a distinguished road
Default

Gee, think I would just rebuild it to the same standards that it was built in the first place. The element spacing are the same as a 6 element Yagi would be. The loops diameters of your Quad should be all standard for any 6 element Quad would be too. Perhaps Henry can say if it can be improved upon, since the day that antenna was first designed wasn't with the benefit of computer modeling. Might be some improvement in the element spacing and boom length. Henry should know.
__________________
BASE: Kenwood TS-2000, GAP Titan DX, Diamond X50A, Sirio SY27-4, and IMAX 2000.
MOBILE: Galaxy DX99V w/RF Limited CR-577 mic, Sirio Z-180. Yaesu FT-8800R & Diamond NR-770.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2012, 05:12 AM
hookedon6's Avatar
W9WDX Amateur Radio Club Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,502
hookedon6 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6.0 Liter View Post
Thoughts anyone? ... All ideas are welcome.
here ya go,....... Quad Antenna JavaScript Calculator just plug in the vitals
6.0 Liter likes this.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2012, 05:47 AM
6.0 Liter's Avatar
Coax abuse???
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 87
6.0 Liter is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks hookedon6...........Marconi, I havnt ordered anything,just thinking, if there is merit in optimizing a bit, now is the time to do it. Maybethe feed system could be improved on a bit, direct fed maybe? This is my first big antenna, having fun with this stuff................
hookedon6 likes this.
__________________
What goes around, comes back around.........sooner or later!

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:15 AM
Needle Bender's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 921
Needle Bender is on a distinguished road
Smile

If you use different wire like stranded insulated 12 gauge you will have shorter wires because of the lower velocity factor of the insulation coated wire. Problem is, once the UV has it's way with the insulation and it falls off it won't be tuned right because the velocity factor will increase and it will go down in frequency, plus since it has been up a while in the wind it is already stretched and will have lowered in frequency.

I believe it will stretch less and last longer if you use stranded copper wire instead of the solid 14ga they sell for it. If you use stranded without insulation then you won't have that changing velocity factor and tuning problem but it's hard to find stranded copper wire without insulation for as cheap a price as home depot has it insulated, so you might want to sharpen your Buck knife or put a new blade in your Stanley drywall knife and strip it off.
Then the tuning process begins.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-09-2012, 12:11 PM
Marconi's Avatar
Supporting Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston & Corpus Christi
Posts: 3,887
Marconi is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6.0 Liter View Post
Thanks hookedon6...........Marconi, I havnt ordered anything,just thinking, if there is merit in optimizing a bit, now is the time to do it. Maybethe feed system could be improved on a bit, direct fed maybe? This is my first big antenna, having fun with this stuff................
Quad Antenna JavaScript Calculator


Above is the link that hookedon6 posted for us. Just enter 27.205mhz so we can compare the results to some SE L4+ dimensions I’ve posted below.
Here are the dimensions I have for the L4+ model. As I understand it, add on kits come in units for additional elements, and they are probably all the same dimensions. So each element past director #1 will be equal or close to 72.25” spacing and 422" in wire length. This is just my assumption however based on studying the L4+ instructions, and asking questions about this antenna for some years.

Boom = 17’ 10”

Spacing
R to Dr=84.25”
Dr to D1=56”
D1 to D2= 72.25”

Wire lengths as best I know,
Reflector=453”
Driver=438” Driver wire per side=109.5”
Director1=425”
Director2=422”
based on the above information any following directors will also be 422”.


6.0 Liter, I can’t be sure what frequency the SE L4 was designed for, but understanding it’s for CB I assume these measurements are close to the lower end of 27 mhz up to about 27.205.

So, compare these measurements with hookedon6’s link for a Quad calculator above, and you will see that Robb’s claim that all Quads are the same dimensions…might not be as truthful as he would have us believe. I don’t believe the Quad generator that HO6 gave us is accurate for this antenna either, because there is no adjustment for the wire diameter, whatever it is. That might make some difference too.

I’m also not sure whether the unique feeder device, itself, used by SE makes a difference in overall dimensions it has, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it did.

SE made these antennas at least as far back as 1978. That was before antenna modeling was available to the average Joe, just like Robb has noted. We didn’t have the personal computer at the time either. However, NEC was developed in the late 70’s and it was based in large part on math and science developed years earlier. I wouldn’t be surprised if the guys at Signal Engineering were smart enough to use such math and engineering to come up with their matching idea for this dual polarity Quad, even without the use of a computer. The dual polarity feature was what was very unique as Quads go, but I think the feeding idea itself…might be quite a bit older in other applications.

6.0Liter, you might be able to set this antenna up with a vast variety of dimensional difference and it still work, but I would first try to get it working as close to specks as possible. If you keep some good notes during construction and testing, you might even be able to detect some differences in performance using your radio.

From my personal experience with a friend who has a L8 that is over 60 miles away, we can talk just about any time using less than 5 watts on SSB after we get each other’s attention that we’re on the air.

6.0Liter, it you measure any of your kit, let me know how your numbers jive with mine, OK? I think your measurements for the fist 4 elements should be about the same as my L4+ measurements above.
6.0 Liter likes this.
__________________
Marconi's YouTube Channel
We're just lucky that Mother Nature doesn't require our antenna systems to be perfect in order to work our radio.

Last edited by Marconi; 02-09-2012 at 12:30 PM.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-09-2012, 12:32 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 353
Henry HPSD is on a distinguished road
Default

Hello,

Marconi has a very valid point.
It is not wise to keep drilling holes in a boom. Though it might be “still oke” from a boom-strength point of view. It is not wise to keep on drilling holes. To be honest..I do not like the drilling holes solution from a manufacturer upfront.
1- No matter how you see it, it does reduce strength.
2- If the wind starts to blow, at some point there will be some much friction the holes become larger. That will give irritation regarding “extra” noises etc.

You might start thinking about some kind of “hubs” . There are quite some different solutions. I’m sure you will be happier with that. Especially if you keep up your antenna work (and you will) it is always easy to make the antenna in such a way you can always replace the “everything”.

It wouldn’t be wise to go for the same spacing’s as a yagi has. It is a different antenna. The diameter as well as the “length” is different. It would only be logical if the spacing is somewhat different.
It might be that the 6el quad can be improved…I don’t know, I do not have the “original” measurements.

What I do know…
The 17,1dBI gain expressed is not real. You should expect a 11/12 dBI from a 30 foot boom.

Just for fun: have you taken a look at the plots given?
If you take a look at the attached PNG file I have enlarged the “plots”. Oke, please believe me when I say 11 dBI is about max from that boom length, heck ill make it a 12 dBI just for fun.

Here comes the fun,
We all know gain comes from suppressing the beam width (your aim becomes more narrower)
This is expressed in the -3dB beam width figures. (please see explination radiation patterns and how to "see" them.) for further explanation about beam width.

What it comes down to: Signal engineering is showing us a -3dB beam width in the order of 20 degrees. Nobody in this world is able to do that. Bare in mind…it would take at least a 3 times multiplication of boom length to get that !
So the antenna pattern provided is..Let’s say “less accurate”.

Besides…the FB is fun too!, in the specs they are -44 dB. However if I take a look at the antenna plots and interoperate them right it is nowhere near 40…just above 20 dB (and that’s not done with the 9meter boom length!)
And, no…I’m not against the this quad…I’m sure it works just fine.
I am against all those wrong figures

Last thing..
That might get a brain working, the SWR beamwidth.
The reason for that is the bandwidth expressed (SWR) it is almost 2 MHz wide! Opposite to what most people think Quads are not know for SWR bandwidth! The 2MHZ expressed means it is an OWA design. OWA designs are known for many positive things but not for maximum gain.

Antennas are fun!

Kind regards,
Henry
Attached Images
File Type: png signal engineering 6.PNG (13.3 KB, 59 views)
Marconi and 6.0 Liter like this.
__________________
1W in a dipole will provide a qso. 100W in a antenna which is 1% as effective as the dipole will do the same. And thats not a good thing.............http://www.cb-antennas.com

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Worldwide Radio Forum



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A 2 element Fixed, Reversible Yagi for 20 Meters RickC. Amateur Radio Antennas 16 09-17-2011 08:13 AM
2 Element Quad HomerBB CB Antennas 52 06-04-2009 09:24 PM
Making a dual polarity Quad beam with one driven element Mr Clean CB Antennas 3 11-11-2006 09:26 PM
ASTROPLANE /Top One Ground Plane Switch Kit CB Antennas 15 07-02-2006 09:25 AM
quad versus groundplane tejanodrum CB Antennas 0 04-02-2004 10:30 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Worldwide Radio Forum