Go Back   WorldwideDX Amateur Radio Forums > Citizens Band Related > CB Antennas


Amateur Callsign Lookup
Enter Callsign:

GAMMA MATCH LOCATION

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-10-2010, 10:05 AM
Capt'nCrunch's Avatar
KX4R
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: ROCKMART, GA
Posts: 4
Capt'nCrunch is on a distinguished road
Talking GAMMA MATCH LOCATION


I HAVE BEEN PUTTING TOGETHER ANTENNAS FOR A LOT OF YEARS AND A FRIEND CALLED AND ASKED DOES IT MATTER WHERE THE GAMMA IS LOCATED ON THE DRIVEN ELEMENT. SHOULD IT BE ON THE LEFT OR RIGHT, OR DOES IT MATTER IF IS ON THE TOP OR THE BOTTOM. I DON'T THINK IT MATTERS AT ALL AS LONG AS THE THE ANTENNA CAN BE TUNED AT THE FEED POINT. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE HOW YOU GUYS LOOK AT THIS TOPIC. I HAVE NOTICED THAT DIFFERENT MAKERS OF ANTENNAS PUT THE GAMMA IN DIFFERENT LOCATIONS ON THERE BEAMS.
__________________
GREGORY J CARTER


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-10-2010, 11:11 AM
Marconi's Avatar
Supporting Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston & Corpus Christi
Posts: 3,874
Marconi is on a distinguished road
Default

IMO, it doesn't matter, but if the matcher has a fixed feed point connector attached, make sure it is located on the element side facing the boom/mast bracket so your coax can exits the driven element correctly.

Never put a gamma on the top of the horizontal element, this is to prevent heavy birds from roosting on it.

Vertical elements should be positioned, when possible, so water cannot settle and not drain out of the capacitor section.

Gammas can be mounted either to the top or bottom side of the vertical element, depending on considerations above.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2010, 03:05 PM
Bionic Chicken's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Mississippi
Posts: 383
Bionic Chicken is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

You can position the gamma match behind the driven element instead of on the side. This will make the forward pattern much tighter but will also reduce the back rejection. I have never set mine up that way but many have down here and that was the results they obtained.
__________________
BC

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-10-2010, 07:05 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: england
Posts: 2,089
bob85 is on a distinguished road
Default

yes the gamma position does effect the pattern skew, freecell had some info on his site on how to minimise skew with gamma fed yagis.
__________________

tom bearden taught me that quantum entanglement allows thought to travell faster than the speed of light, this explains why at first you can think somebody is smart but if you wait a while you will see they are not very bright at all.


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2010, 11:40 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 353
Henry HPSD is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bionic Chicken View Post
You can position the gamma match behind the driven element instead of on the side. This will make the forward pattern much tighter but will also reduce the back rejection. I have never set mine up that way but many have down here and that was the results they obtained.
Hi guys,

Im guessing the gammamatch is still attached to the radiating element ? in that case..
Is there anywhere we could back-up those claims?, im a bit sceptic..i dont think it will make the forward pattern much tighter..and reduce back rejection..

If the forward patern becomes much tighter, that would probarbly implicates the gain would enhance too.
And if the front to back improved..that often means the gain will go down or you will sacrifice in bandwidth.

If it is true...why wouldnt all the antenna companies use it in that way. Everyone wants a tigther pattern and better FB ?

Ofcourse i understand that your thougths are that it is true..but is there any change i could get some facts ?

73 H.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:40 AM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 543
HiDef is on a distinguished road
Default

One way to compare performance with yagis is to turn them exactly 90 degrees from the signal and look for the depth of the null. Larger ones with a straight guyed boom can do over 25dB received signal strength dip.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-11-2010, 06:54 AM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: england
Posts: 2,089
bob85 is on a distinguished road
Default

the information i have seen said the gamma position effected the skew, i dont recall it saying anything about beamwidth.
__________________

tom bearden taught me that quantum entanglement allows thought to travell faster than the speed of light, this explains why at first you can think somebody is smart but if you wait a while you will see they are not very bright at all.


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-11-2010, 07:04 AM
Crotchety Old Bastard
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 6,797
W5LZ is on a distinguished road
Default

A gamma match is a 'one-sided' device, meaning it will be found on one side of the element's center or the other. It can't be placed 'behind' the element. If it is, it's no longer a gamma match. You might be confusing a gamma with a delta or beta maybe.
In any case, placing that match in front of, or behind the element isn't going to change the gain or 'sharpness' of the resulting radiation pattern, or it's F/B ratio.
A gamma match 'skews' the radiation pattern of a beam? Yes, VERY slightly. And so do a 'ton' of other things near that directional antenna, that's normal. The 'perfectly' formed, 'smooth', pattern representations you see are the results of statistical 'smoothing' done to make the resulting pattern uniform. All the antenna modeling programs do that. And YOU do that when graphic the results of taking measurements and plotting them on paper. You sort of 'average' out the plotted points, make it a 'smooth' curve.
And then when you come down to actually putting a directional antenna into use, does your rotor really point things that accurately? There's no 'play' in the whole structure that the wind doesn't 'play' with? Those "one degree" marks on that rotor indicator's dial are for filling spaces, not because the rotor is that accurate. (They do make handy reference marks though.)
[Reminds me a lot of the 'jiggle' correction thingy in the newer digital cameras, but you'd better have some extra memory for that thing to work.]
Why don't you find those matching devices on top of, or below the driven element? Mostly because it increases the 'sail' area of the antenna, which isn't the best idea in the world.
Think about it, then tell me how I'm wrong.
- 'Doc

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Worldwide Radio Forum



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stock Maco gamma vs off-the-shelf beta match CHALLENGE! Master Chief CB Antennas 30 04-26-2012 04:09 PM
Yagi gamma match Moleculo CB Antennas 4 09-12-2010 04:48 PM
Gamma Match location Andy CB Antennas 2 02-19-2007 12:26 PM
gamma match 2112 CB Antennas 11 01-24-2007 11:30 AM
Gamma Match Adjusments tecnicoloco CB Antennas 9 10-27-2006 10:56 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Worldwide Radio Forum