Go Back   Worldwide DX Amateur Radio Forums - Ham - CB - HF - VHF - UHF > Citizens Band Related > CB Band and CB Radios


Amateur Callsign Lookup
Enter Callsign:

Got my Mauldulator today, WOW

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 10-28-2009, 05:39 PM
Junior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6
Tink is on a distinguished road
Default


Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockwave View Post
Tink,

I know what Hi-Fi is and can easily achieve more bandwidth with flat response then we normally find on the broadcast bands. Once you know how to spot bypassing caps, coupling caps, and negative feedback loops in the audio chain, this is no difficult task.

Years ago I use to modulate radios from the outside using Hi-Fi stereo audio amps. Then I learned how to modify the radios internal audio stages to achieve the same results. It's a simple audio amplifier not rocket science. With a signal generator, a scope, and a schematic results are easy.

I enjoy AM and sharing what I've learned with others free of charge. At the recommendation of WA1HLR and W2NBC I will be posting one of my more popular modifications on the The AM Window site. The TS-940S is a very common radio that can be purchased used inexpensively now. You probably know they sound fairly bad on AM stock.

You don't need to travel all the way to Connecticut just to see mine. You can copy my modification and have you're very own. You can sweep it, look at it on the spectrum analyzer, and scrutinize the entire modification if you wish. Bottom line is it will provide every bit of fidelity you can get by modulating a rig from the outside and you can prove it to yourself.

The best part is my modification does not require the use of any external equipment that could introduce new places for RFI to migrate into the audio chain. Once the moderator on the amwindow site uploads the modification, I will post the links here. My documentation includes step by step instructions with photos. It renders old school outboard modulators obsolete by using Hi-Fi low level RF modulation as opposed to restricted IF modulation.

I was not interested in copying your modification, for I am happy with the results I already have. I was interested in a comparison. You made the claim that you can achieve hi fidelity with $10 in radio shack parts, implying that it would be comparable to to the Mauldulator. I am merely saying I would be interested in seeing the actual test in reality that you were discussing in words.

I have been modifying radios for years. I know my way around the coupling and bypass caps. We use the same concepts on the receiver end to improve their response, and I agree it is not rocket science. I am not critical of your work or your results, I am just responding to your comparison and I would like to see it happen. You mentioned having a flat response over a wider range than broadcast. I have no problem with that at all. The first night we got the Mauldulator functioning, we put in 30 KHz and saw the sidebands at the proper amplitudes on the spectrum analyzer. We can go as low as you like also. If you want to take out some filtering we intentionally put in, we can go to DC and you can use the audio in jack as a carrier control. You are not going to be able to do that very easily on most CBs by merely changing capacitors. Most of the audio stages are capacitively coupled and if you tried DC coupling, you would mess up the bias of the transistors something fierce.

I think it would be a fun test to compare the performance side by side. It looks like we are on opposite ends of the country, but if it could be worked out, I think it would be enjoyable.

Regards

Tink
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Worldwide Radio Forum
  #82  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:22 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 54
Shockwave is on a distinguished road
Default

I figured our locations would make it impractical to do your side by side testing and that's why I offered to get on 3.885. Even that probably will not work since east coast to west coast contacts their are rather difficult. Just like you I've had to add filtering after the modification because the response was from 1 cycle to nearly 100 KHz. This is no problem to do with stages that are capacitively coupled. Perhaps I can't get DC but getting the watt meter to go up and down at one cycle per second is not hard. You agree that is just as good as DC right?

The TA7222AP in the 148 GTL was designed as a stereo output chip. Surely you know it's able to reproduce Hi-Fi and the feedback loop from pin 9 (output) to pins 5 (gain adjust) and 6 (feedback) are what kills the high end. Test circuits given in the data sheet for this chip will show you how to easily configure it as an amp with flat response. Quite different from the stock circuit used in the Cobra. I'm interested in knowing what you think is going to prevent Hi-Fi modification here?

One main thing you seem to overlook is that there has never been a CB radio receiver manufactured that can reproduce lower then 200 cycles and higher then 4 KHz. Typical receiver response is 300 Hz to 3 KHz. At least on 75 meters there are receivers that can reproduce Hi-Fi. It's not very practical to think that everyone is going to modify their CB receivers to pass this bandwidth that essentially gets wasted on 11 meters.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 10-28-2009, 11:58 PM
Junior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6
Tink is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockwave View Post
One main thing you seem to overlook is that there has never been a CB radio receiver manufactured that can reproduce lower then 200 cycles and higher then 4 KHz. Typical receiver response is 300 Hz to 3 KHz. At least on 75 meters there are receivers that can reproduce Hi-Fi. It's not very practical to think that everyone is going to modify their CB receivers to pass this bandwidth that essentially gets wasted on 11 meters.
I am not overlooking it, I am painfully aware of it. I don't use this on CB, other folks do. I have helped modify some receivers so that they can benefit from hearing the higher fidelity, but obviously the bigger crowd is going to miss out on the higher fidelity. This is a topic that I have discussed with MMM frequently.

Maybe I'll bump into you on a cold winter night on 3885. I hear those folks sometimes late on Saturday nights. We are mostly on 3870 on the west coast.

73 Tink
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 10-29-2009, 03:49 AM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: england
Posts: 1,022
bob85 is on a distinguished road
Default

hello tink/shockwave,

theres no doubt most cb's without restrictive modulation transformers can do hifiwide audio on both tx and rx,
i demonstrated it to prime and mmm by direct injecting audio into the am modulator of an old cb from my wifes cd player headphone output and recording the audio received on my jrc receiver in wide am,
i did it because a bunch of superbowl guys were on paltalk claiming plastic cb's always sound plastic, i used primes song "no excuses on the bowl" which i thought was a fitting source material for superbowl naysayers,

i had been asking them for months if anybody had swapped filters and broadbanded the audio stages, i was amazed that in the land of AM cb none of them had changed any caps or fit wider filters in their plastic fantastic swingading radios,
though to myself i can make any plastic export do 10hz-20khz tx easy,
it took me all of 10 minutes to find an old ar144 and hook it up wideboy style,
even with the bandwidth restriction of the jrc's receiver and no tx eq it still made bass and trebble way beyond any stock cb transmitter as you would expect,
primes reaction was "gtfooh, that aint no plastic cb"
yes it was a plastic cb, it was just how i described it, prime called it a 4lbs globeking,
i had no eq at the time so it did not sound good to my ears but it did sound wide and not at all plastic,

next i swapped the stock 4kc am/ssb lattice filter in a second ar144 to a 15kc filter then rather than changing caps in the audio stages to broadband the rx audio i took a shortcut to hifi tapping audio straight from the am detector buffer and amplified it through a single ended tube hifi amp to get what most would describe as hifi am audio from a plastic cb,
first thing i noticed was that without audio tone shaping it sounds very wide but as flat as a kipper, needs some tx eq,

i played with it for a hour or so trying to figure out how to do asymetrical modulation which i knew tink and mmm were working on with the yet to be named prototype mauldulator then got bored and put it back in the garrage untill we get some good usa skip,
nobody in my area uses AM cb, even less want to listen to superwide AM cb transmissions, i am the AM lone ranger with nobody to bounce ideas off or listen to what im doing for some feedback,

having a deficit of power and a surplus of enthusiasm i have decided its easier and more efficient to inject audio from my datong asp,
i will slice through the wideboys like the grim reaper with my narrow intelligible rf processor
__________________
the blind lead the blind but the enlightened will lead you to the sigma4
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 11-10-2009, 08:45 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 415
Mr Clean is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I heard Motor Mouth on 6 today and all I can say is Ive never heard a better sounding station. If his stuff he sells sounds half as good I would be impressed.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 11-14-2009, 06:36 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35
wahlrite is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Clean View Post
I heard Motor Mouth on 6 today and all I can say is Ive never heard a better sounding station. If his stuff he sells sounds half as good I would be impressed.
what you hear is what you get, It's just that simple
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WOW.... 74IN General Ham Radio Discussion 2 08-24-2009 12:30 PM
Wow, Just Wow... ButtFuzz RADIO AND RADIO RELATED MODIFICATIONS 83 07-19-2009 02:38 PM
Wow...I'm stoked..... WX2MIG General Ham Radio Discussion 31 02-14-2009 10:44 PM
Wow, I'll buy three!!!! 74IN CB Band and CB Radios 4 02-10-2009 05:10 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Worldwide Radio Forum