WorldWide Radio Forum  

Go Back   WorldWide Radio Forum > General Discussion > FCC & ARRL Activity




Notices

FCC & ARRL Activity News, info and publications that effect the radio hobby.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2008, 09:31 PM
Beetle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 766
Beetle is on a distinguished road
Default

On the other hand, the Viking Ranger and Valiant (among other EF Johnson products), the DX-35, DX-40 and DX-100 from Heathkit, and lots of other transmitters from the late 1950s had 11 meters built right in.
__________________
No trees were harmed in the sending of this post; however, many electrons were inconvenienced.

73 de K7KBN
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2008, 10:25 PM
mackmobile43's Avatar
Proud Pro-White American
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 533
mackmobile43 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W5LZ View Post
The FT-101 was manufactured during the time when 11 meters -was- a ham band. So, it could cover that band legally 'right out of the box'. Doesn't apply to radios made after 11 meters was removed from the ham bands.
If you find an FT-101 that is still in the original box, never having been removed, never been turned on, you'd better hang on to that thing! It's worth a fortune ...
- 'Doc
The the ft-101 should have lost fcc type acceptance when they gave the d band away.

No one is above the law.
__________________
When I die, I want to go out just like my Grandpa did, in his sleep, and not like the screaming passenger on his motorcycle...
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2008, 11:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,837
W5LZ is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

1971? Okay, then which Yaesu am I thinking of?
- 'Doc
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 07-11-2008, 11:42 PM
Beetle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 766
Beetle is on a distinguished road
Default

Maybe the FL-101? It had two "auxiliary" positions on the bandswitch, which were probably activated by inserting a crystal.
__________________
No trees were harmed in the sending of this post; however, many electrons were inconvenienced.

73 de K7KBN
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2008, 06:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: reading,pa
Posts: 119
bioman is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mackmobile43 View Post
The the ft-101 should have lost fcc type acceptance when they gave the d band away.

No one is above the law.
what everyone is trying to explain is that there is NO " type acceptance" when it comes to HAMs............

if i want to i can modify my toaster to transmit on 10M and it is "legal" to both posess AND use on the amature bands....

i could even sell my toatser to a fellow ham for him to use......

however if i start manufacturing my "ham radio"/toasters by the thousands and have them marketed towards the 11M crowd by adding echo,roger beeps,a "whatever you do don't plug sourdough into toaster slot A since then this toaster would transmit out of band" type of disclaimers ,marketing in truckstops <not ripping on truckdrivers here...im a truckdriver myself> etc etc then the FCC may very well ban my "toasters"

HOWEVER as the FCC will tell you it is STILL legal for a HAM to use my "toaster" on the amaure bands for which he <or she> is licensed......EVEN tho it is ILLEGAL to sell my toasters in the US

make sense??

nobody really cares about people running power etc on 11M HOWEVER when non-amatures invade the 10M bands with the attitude <and i quote here ...i personally heard this guy say this> "I bought this radio I can talk here if I want to" the we have a problem......

if you don't have a license you DO NOT belong on the ham bands......

if 11M operators would have stayed in the 27Mhz and down into the upper portion of 26 i seriously doubt there would be a problem

but some bad apples spoiled it for the bunch.........

we worked for that license and those are our bands.....

by trying to "loophole" the law galaxy etc shot themselves in the foot by putting 10M in these radios.......

if when you modified it for 11M it "turned off " 10M in the radio i dont think we would be having this conversation
__________________
cdx-1557 reading pennsylvania keystone state

Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2008, 10:28 AM
King Mudduck's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 285 Western North Carolina waving!
Posts: 857
King Mudduck is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I have something i would like to say if you all would indulge me for a second.

It seems ridiculous to me that the FCC would get there panties in a bunch over something this meaningless while Joe Blows cb shop is selling these things left and right. Not to mention those 1000+++ watt splatter amps and those CB shops tune ( splatter tunes ) up's. Where is the FCC while eBay sells the hell out of this stuff? Where's the FCC when some ass on CH 6 is bleeding all over the place.....from 25.000 MHz to 28.000 MHz? Where has the FCC been! It seems to me that if they would have done there job years ago that this would not be such a huge problem now.

After all this time that i have spent on this forum i have come to understand that the ham ops where right all along about how their rights as licensed operators where being taken away by freebanders and by people causing so much interference because of extremely high powered and or poorly tuned radios. Though im sure they have sent in complaint upon complaint in to them ( FCC ) over the years they have not done a damn thing about it! Now they want to get all bent out of shape over something like this! It does not make a hell of a lot of since to me.
__________________
Forget the Democrat VS Republin argument. Both parties are destroying this country, WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2008, 06:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,163
moleculo has disabled reputation
Default

Wow, I just went back and glanced at that thread again on the other forum. There sure are a lot of misinformed people with very strong opinions. I guess THAT isn't anything new.

The funny thing about all the anxiety over there is that the people who make the "list" of what radios are illegal in the U.S. are a bunch of ham ops commissioned by the ARRL. We've even discussed this fact over the years on this forum. If hams want to get something changed, they can but they're not going to do it by whining about the FCC. They / We need to start with the organization that is supposed to be representing their best interest to the FCC.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2008, 08:08 PM
268 268 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Elev. 4982 ft.
Posts: 11
268 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bioman View Post
what everyone is trying to explain is that there is NO " type acceptance" when it comes to HAMs............

if i want to i can modify my toaster to transmit on 10M and it is "legal" to both posess AND use on the amature bands....

i could even sell my toatser to a fellow ham for him to use......

however if i start manufacturing my "ham radio"/toasters by the thousands and have them marketed towards the 11M crowd by adding echo,roger beeps,a "whatever you do don't plug sourdough into toaster slot A since then this toaster would transmit out of band" type of disclaimers ,marketing in truckstops <not ripping on truckdrivers here...im a truckdriver myself> etc etc then the FCC may very well ban my "toasters"

HOWEVER as the FCC will tell you it is STILL legal for a HAM to use my "toaster" on the amaure bands for which he <or she> is licensed......EVEN tho it is ILLEGAL to sell my toasters in the US

make sense??

nobody really cares about people running power etc on 11M HOWEVER when non-amatures invade the 10M bands with the attitude <and i quote here ...i personally heard this guy say this> "I bought this radio I can talk here if I want to" the we have a problem......

if you don't have a license you DO NOT belong on the ham bands......

if 11M operators would have stayed in the 27Mhz and down into the upper portion of 26 i seriously doubt there would be a problem

but some bad apples spoiled it for the bunch.........

we worked for that license and those are our bands.....

by trying to "loophole" the law galaxy etc shot themselves in the foot by putting 10M in these radios.......

if when you modified it for 11M it "turned off " 10M in the radio i dont think we would be having this conversation
There's some of the problem right there. Those are not "your bands". They are licensed to HAMS to use. They do not belong to you. They belong to the FCC. They can yank them from you in a minute. If you HAMS have nothing better to do than gripe about lowly old cb'ers and their radios then you all need to get a life. I mean really folks. Just how hard is it to get a ticket? It's not rocket science. Those idiots that buy export radios and go into HAM bands where they aren't allowed to be are just that... Idiots. Because who wants to talk to a bunch of stuffy, nose thumbing people anyhow. There is way too much errogance in the HAM community. Your license makes you no better than a guy who has a CDL over your regular car only drivers license. Or does it?
__________________
268 wavin'
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2008, 08:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,837
W5LZ is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I think maybe a better comparison would be someone who has a drivers license, and someone who doesn't. The ham bands 'belong' to hams just like a street 'belongs' to a driver licensed to use that street.
For every finger pointed in one direction there will be another pointed in the opposite direction. So what else is new? I've done the pointing, and I've been pointed at. Get's boring after a while, so why bother?
- 'Doc
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2008, 11:06 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: tustin, ca
Posts: 161
dudmuck is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Perhaps the characteristic that qualifies a radio as banned is the chrome knobs and the channel switch. If the General Lee had a VFO instead of a channel & band switch, then it would be legal.

Sending a note to QRZ admins about a banned radio being sold on their site costs the FCC nothing. Sending an agent into the field to investigate a CH6 splatter station costs money.

Family Guy on the FCC:
__________________
"Y'all mind hanging back? You're jamming my frequencies" -- Tangina in Poltergeist
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
WorldWide Radio Forum