If you are trying to refute the article it would do justice to verify your quote.
As far as the article it was referring to radio frequency devices outside of Amateur or
CB use. The problem is that some state that if you use a radio frequency device you agree to inspection by its use. The problem is that is not told to the consumer. I just opened a brand new wireless phone. Nowhere
does it state that one is subject to follow the rules and yield to inspection. It just states the product is found to comply with the limits with
FCC regulations in Part 15. Nowhere is it remotely implied that the consumer is subject to inspection if the device is problematic. Nowhere does it state that the consumer must comply to Part 15. That is the crutch of the article.
The
FCC makes this statement which the article refutes is legal-
Quote:
Whether you operate an amateur station or any other radio device, your
authorization from the Commission comes with the obligation to allow
inspection.
|
With the RF devices mentioned in the article this requirement is not presented to the consumer with the purchase of said device .