Go Back   Worldwide DX Amateur Radio Forums - Ham - CB - HF - VHF - UHF > Amateur Radio Related > HF Bands and HF Rigs


Amateur Callsign Lookup
Enter Callsign:

Yaesu FT-897D vs. Yaesu FT-857D

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:03 AM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 142
KD8LWX is on a distinguished road
Default Yaesu FT-897D vs. Yaesu FT-857D


My dumb question of the day.

What is the difference between the Yaesu FT-897D and Yaesu FT-857D?

I can not find where they are lined up head to head.

Thanks
__________________
CISA, CISSP, Computer geek
clueless about HAM

www.linkedin.com/in/dariandunn
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Worldwide Radio Forum
  #2  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:33 AM
Drenalin's Avatar
Ready ,Steady ,Go
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Orange County New York
Posts: 7
Drenalin is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up Yaesu FT-897D vs Yaesu FT-857D

Quote:
Originally Posted by KD8LWX View Post
My dumb question of the day.

What is the difference between the Yaesu FT-897D and Yaesu FT-857D?

I can not find where they are lined up head to head.

Thanks
1.Both radio's share the same circuit board, although the 897D has room for either a yaesu power supply that was made to fit inside the radio or two large battery packs which allows for portable use with power output of 20 watts.

2.Both can share the same yaesu MH-31 stock mic or the yaesu MH-36 DTMF mic.

3.Both can use the same collins mechanical SSB & CW Filters.

4.The 897D comes with the TCXO-9 from factory while the 857D is purchased as an option.

Other than that, look at both radios as big brother and little brother.

(and yes I have both of them)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2009, 12:16 PM
TonyV225's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,032
TonyV225 is on a distinguished road
Default

My wife runs an 857Din one of her vehicles its a great little radio Im thinking about getting another one. I know the 897D also has the option of adding an external or removable battery for QRP.
__________________
""""was not thinking of a cber sat with his makita screwdriver winding round the presets untill his meter said s9+60db from a guy on a handheld 15 miles away""""
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2009, 12:36 PM
Captain Kilowatt's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nova Scotia,Canada
Posts: 3,113
Captain Kilowatt is on a distinguished road
Default

They are the same radio in a differant box basically. Even Yaesu says that. The display is a bit differant and as said the 897 has room for either a builtin PSU or battery pack but as for performance and specs they are the same radio built on the same circuit board. The 897 lends itself to base operations better while the 857 is better suited for mobile use.
__________________
Front/back ratio comes from the antenna. Forward gain comes from the wall socket.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:02 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 142
KD8LWX is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyV225 View Post
My wife runs an 857Din one of her vehicles its a great little radio Im thinking about getting another one. I know the 897D also has the option of adding an external or removable battery for QRP.
QRP?

Quote:
Originally Posted by QRN View Post
The 897 lends itself to base operations better while the 857 is better suited for mobile use.
Why, I was thinking just the opposite because of the internal batteries?
__________________
CISA, CISSP, Computer geek
clueless about HAM

www.linkedin.com/in/dariandunn

Last edited by KD8LWX; 09-29-2009 at 01:19 PM. Reason: missed a comma
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:17 PM
TonyV225's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,032
TonyV225 is on a distinguished road
Default

The 897 is quite a bit bigger than the 857 in size
__________________
""""was not thinking of a cber sat with his makita screwdriver winding round the presets untill his meter said s9+60db from a guy on a handheld 15 miles away""""
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2009, 02:11 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,156
moleculo has disabled reputation
Default

The 857D is the size of a 2m/440 mobile radio, while the 897 is a lot larger. The 857D has a removable face plate for convenient mobile operation. The 897D is intended to be use a base or portable, but not mobile. When you install the internal batteries on the 897d, you are limited to 20 watts (if I remember correctly), however hooking up to the an external battery gets you the full 100 watts. The internal power supply option on the 897D is really neat.

I have an 897D and I used to have an 857D.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2009, 05:03 PM
Captain Kilowatt's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nova Scotia,Canada
Posts: 3,113
Captain Kilowatt is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moleculo View Post
I have an 897D and I used to have an 857D.
I have never had the 897, but I have used one, but I do have the 857 in the mobile. It makes a nice small package and with the FC-40 autotuner mounted on the rear hatch door it also makes a nice all band package.
__________________
Front/back ratio comes from the antenna. Forward gain comes from the wall socket.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2009, 05:54 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 36
Simon004 is on a distinguished road
Default

both sound well, work well, get good reviews.....

just a shame they are both so damn ugly

or is that just me?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-29-2009, 06:46 PM
jazzsinger's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 236
jazzsinger is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon004 View Post
both sound well, work well, get good reviews.....

just a shame they are both so damn ugly

or is that just me?
I wouldn't say they were ugly,but Barbara Bush or Anne Widdecombe have more chance of winning Miss World than either of them.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.worldwidedx.com/hf-bands-hf-rigs/36338-yaesu-yaesu-897d-vs-yaesu-yaesu-857d.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Yaesu ft857d vs ft100d This thread Refback 10-24-2009 02:15 PM 12

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
yaesu 857d and atas120 as a home station. m6rkw Amateur Radio Antennas 4 08-31-2009 12:24 PM
Ideas on an auto tuner for the wifes Yaesu 857D TonyV225 HF Bands and HF Rigs 9 07-14-2009 05:28 AM
YAESU NIGHTMARES! Happy_Hamer HF Bands and HF Rigs 25 04-04-2008 09:49 PM
857d, 897d, 817nd, 706mk2g or ft100d dxhound HF Bands and HF Rigs 30 01-25-2008 10:09 AM
Yaesu FT 897D AudioShockwav HF Bands and HF Rigs 20 10-23-2005 03:46 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Worldwide Radio Forum