Multiple Radio Cablin and Base Schematics = Need Opnions  | | 
04-08-2009, 07:29 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7
| | Multiple Radio Cablin and Base Schematics = Need Opnions Hello All
I'm rewiring my base station and have the following plan (see image) to accomodate multiple radios and linears
What kind of DB insertion-loss should I expect due to the amount of device that are inline example: Jumpers, Meters, Switches, filters....
All suggestions are welcomed.
Thx | 
04-08-2009, 09:27 PM
|  | WWRF Moderator | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Silicon Valley CA, Storm Lake IA
Posts: 1,978
| | How long are the patch cords going to be?
Each item generally has published insertion loss. Such as the filters and the switches. I don't think the linears apply, though. I don't know if meters publish insertion loss in their specs. But then again - I don't know - maybe they do.
Maybe between 2-4 db insertion loss - total - from the mic to the antenna. But what bothers me about this huge 'chain', is the the amount of elements you have in it. I know that I run my radio straight to the antenna. The ONLY time I use the meter is to make sure the antenna is all right. But I'm sure many people don't do it the way that I do - too...
__________________ What gear do I use?
BASE: Icom IC-718 & GAP Titan DX, Yaesu FT-8800R & Diamond X50A, Magnum OmegaForce S45 & IMAX 2000 w/Astatic D104/TUP9.
MOBILE: Galaxy DX99V & Wilson 1000 w/Astatic D104-M2, Yaesu FT-8800R & Diamond NR-770. "...WR-11 San Jose CA - Standing By..."
Last edited by Robb; 04-09-2009 at 12:30 PM.
| 
04-08-2009, 09:54 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7
| | right now I'm considering 6ft so I can manage the cables under my desk.
RG8X mini | 
04-08-2009, 10:29 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,743
| | On HF you really don't have to worry that much about insertion loss. VHF/ UHF, yes, then you need to worry about it.
Question, What is the ICE HF Filter for?
Oh and the RG8x is fine for the jumpers in the shack. Depending on how long the run is to the antenna, you might want better coax there. | 
04-09-2009, 02:46 AM
| | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,335
| | I would say that your plan ought'a pretty well handle things. I'd echo da'Mole' about insertion loss at HF. There will be some, but nothing to worry about.
I would suggest taking care about connecting all those radios through a switch. As in making that switch short the inactive positions to ground (or even better, a 50 ohm load), and making sure you've got the right position selected at any particular time. Lots of RF floating around in that switch and back into the inactive radios. Not exactly the best thing in the world for them. Turning the inactive radios off would also be a good idea. (As if you never thought about that, right?)
Have fun.
- 'Doc | 
04-09-2009, 07:24 AM
| | BANNED | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: non-cartesian cyberspace
Posts: 1,450
| | "What kind of DB insertion-loss should I expect due to the amount of device that are inline example: Jumpers, Meters, Switches, filters...."
[Rob] ....between 2-4 db....
(Fact, not opinion) try less than 0.2db. per device, (insignificant, negligible) typical for most well designed measuring equipment and antenna switches. insertion loss for bird measuring devices for example can be as low as 0.1db.. antenna switches utilizing cavity-type construction are able to maintain insertion losses of less than 0.2db..
Last edited by freecell; 04-09-2009 at 07:55 AM.
| 
04-09-2009, 08:35 AM
| | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,335
| | YamahaDude,
Don't get too wrapped up in that doing things 'right' thingy. There are almost always more than one way to do things 'right'. It just depends on the particular situation and what you can do, and exactly what you mean by 'right'.
Your plan so far isn't 'wrong' in any huge (or small) way, it ought'a work just fine. I'm sure that after you have it up and running you'll find maybe one or two things you'll wish you had done differently. That's about as normal as it gets, happens to everybody. The best planning you can do is to sort of eliminate any huge 'glaring' mistakes that you, or someone else happens to see. From there, just wing it. (Of course, after getting it all running smoothly, you can gloat about how thoughtful you were to come up with such a 'perfect' set up! Sound familiar, by any chance?? Don't spread that around, it's a 'trade' secret you know.)
Good luck.
- 'Doc | 
04-09-2009, 09:19 AM
| | BANNED | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: non-cartesian cyberspace
Posts: 1,450
| | if you get off your lazy ass, download and read the manuals and pdf file (instead of throwing the links up there for someone else to do your work for you) you would know that ICE products is the ONLY manufacturer that provides any insertion loss figures, ie. .1 - .4db. @ approach to cutoff. call the rest of them as they don't provide the information that you're looking for.
opinions are like assholes, everyone has one and they're all different. call the manufacturers and ask them, that is if they even know. Rob already gave you an opinion that is grossly in error, (2-4db.) expect more of the same. the expensive stuff generally has the lowest insertion loss and the manufacturers don't mind providing the information. get a clue.
i have already scanned all of the available information for every link you posted.
if you want the information for the rest of them then pick up the phone and go to work, or do you want us to do that for you too?
"What kind of DB insertion-loss should I expect due to the amount of device that are inline example: Jumpers, Meters, Switches, filters...."
generally speaking, insertion loss will be higher for cheap equipment and measurably less for quality components. if the manufacturers who build the stuff don't know then you're SOL. your question has been answered.
Last edited by freecell; 04-09-2009 at 09:33 AM.
| 
04-09-2009, 10:12 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7
| | Freecell    
you put a smile on my face......go to love the internet....Great part of this is that there is not to many of you out there!!!!!
Have a nice.. day.... if you dont want to help people simply dont....it's not that hard not to click reply.....
It's your choice....... Sounds like you made a bad choice when you decided to reply my post... it seems that it made you upset... (that is bad for the heart!!!!!My radios are not worth getting you that upset..)
Thx for the reply!!! |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:15 PM. |