Go Back   Worldwide DX Amateur Radio Forums - Ham - CB - HF - VHF - UHF > Citizens Band Related > MURS / FRS


Amateur Callsign Lookup
Enter Callsign:

GMRS vs MURS

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-07-2009, 08:03 AM
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: indiana
Posts: 396
doctor is on a distinguished road
Default GMRS vs MURS


GMRS is not active here only 1 contact in many months, and on the otherhand MURS has a few contacts and a bit of distance of 50 miles so far.

Considering a dual vertical for both GMRS/MURS anyone suggest or have one and what is the operating status..miles, reception etc.

DOCTOR/795

151.94 795 in the cornfields
__________________
73

WAVING A HAND FROM CORNFIELDS OF INDIANA..HAVE A GREAT DAY
CDX 795/CEF795
MURS ...151.94..VOICE OF THE CORNFIELD..795
Member...REACT INTERNATIONAL

CQ100/HAMSPHERE
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Worldwide Radio Forum
  #2  
Old 04-07-2009, 02:05 PM
Beetle's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 1,225
Beetle is on a distinguished road
Default

Doctor -

I think there's a bit of confusion here. The General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) incorporates several radio services as spelled out in 47 CFR Part 95:

FRS (95.191)
R/C (95.201)
CB (95.4)
MURS (95.632)

...and a few others. Basic 40-channel CB is and has been an integral part of Part 95.

Don't confuse "GMRS" with FRS or MURS. The latter two are separate entities under GMRS. Here's a link to a list of ALL the "Parts" of 47 CFR (the FCC rules).

FCC Parts
__________________
If you're like everybody else,
you're about average.
73 de K7KBN
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-07-2009, 07:33 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 60
scantheband is on a distinguished road
Default

A dual band GMRS/MURS antenna sounds interesting, although I've never used one.

Generally, I would say that MURS would offer more range per Watt (not taking into account a GMRS repeater) over GMRS. Also, I would think there would be more of a possibility of tropo band openings on VHF MURS rather than UHF GMRS.

Remember, the height of the antenna is of prime importance, of course.
__________________
CB'er since the sixties;
Ham since the seventies;
Plum Loco since birth.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-2009, 08:28 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,485
KingCobra_CDX882 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Well

Both GMRS/FRS and Murs can do quite well
Forgetting the added power on the repeater frequency's of GMRS
Murs can get out further while operating simplex

I use a Comet GP9 52 or 54 ft high at the base
(this is actually tuned for 2 meters and 70 cm bands.but work reat on GMRS and MURS)

I also use a 9 element (horizonal) beam for MURS (works Great)
I also use a 16 element(horizontal)beam for GMRS(works Great)

Both Murs and GMRS (simplex ) i easily work 50 miles vertical and much more on horizontal
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-11-2009, 08:00 AM
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: indiana
Posts: 396
doctor is on a distinguished road
Default 16 element

KING COBRA

What brand name of the 16 element do you use for GMRS, looking for something like that.

On MURS I use a 7 element 2 meter beam and satisfied with it, but sure want to improve the performance on GMRS.

I understand the VHF opened yesterday as far North to Tenn, and was open in Texas also for MURS, be nice to see a forum for these bands.

Thanks/73

DOCTOR/CDX795

151.94/VOICE OF THE CORNFIELDS/INDIANA
__________________
73

WAVING A HAND FROM CORNFIELDS OF INDIANA..HAVE A GREAT DAY
CDX 795/CEF795
MURS ...151.94..VOICE OF THE CORNFIELD..795
Member...REACT INTERNATIONAL

CQ100/HAMSPHERE
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-11-2009, 06:36 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,485
KingCobra_CDX882 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I Agree..
Would make a good thread to see what skip is going on with MURS and GMRS

As to what 16 element beam i use for GMRS
here is a link to their stuff

Home Page

He no longer makes my 16 element 430-450 mhz beam but He has a larger 22 element as well as a Stacked pair of 22 element beams

Pete makes good stuff

Another company to consider is M2
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-28-2009, 05:07 PM
De_Wildfire's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 37
De_Wildfire is on a distinguished road
Default Which one do I use?

I'm confused about MURS and FRS/GMRS without repeaters. They say FRS/GMRS is better for wrapping around buildings and being side. So if I am on the beach or walking down the boardwalk and I need to stay in touch with someone at the resort which service is better?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-28-2009, 05:10 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,151
moleculo has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
They say FRS/GMRS is better for wrapping around buildings and being side.
I'm not sure who is saying that but that's a little misleading. FRS/GMRS operates at the top end of 400Mhz. That frequency range is terrible for getting around buildings, hills, etc. The frequencies that MURS uses is much better. However, some areas have GMRS repeaters, which sort of helps solve that proble. They're not all that widespread, though. For your scenario, I would vote for the MURS option.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-28-2009, 07:48 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,485
KingCobra_CDX882 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I am Not sure why so many started thinking GMRS or UHF was good to bounce around buildings or other objects..

Basically...
UHF frequency's ( which include GMRS ) are Strictly LINE of SIGHT.
It also works well for ham radio for doing satellite contacts..

From a stand point of whether GMRS ( without repeaters) or MURS will enable further contacts...

Well can go a couple of different ways..

You have many more channels you have to use in GMRS ( not counting FRS) and so one might think that makes GMRS better..

However because MURS is within VHF frequency's you are likely to get further distance talking on MURS...
Both with and without the various types of skip..
But there are less channels within MURS..

GMRS is far more likely to have activity though given how many and how easily available GMRS radios are..

If your looking for regular contacts with a particular person then it is likely MURS that is better suited ( because of how VHF typically travels further both with and without various skip conditions )

If you are able or willing to consider repeaters..Then the pendulum swings back to GMRS..

Regardless which you find Best for you..
The important thing to remember is...
The BEST antenna you can get..
The HIGHEST you can mount it..

By me there is not a lot going on on MURS ( there is actually police using one of the MURS channels) but regular joe people by me rarely use MURS..

GMRS though has a crazy amount of people on it ( including many repeaters too ).

Guess it all depends on what your looking for as well as which is used more by you..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-28-2009, 08:30 PM
dudmuck's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: tustin, ca
Posts: 381
dudmuck is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doctor View Post
On MURS I use a 7 element 2 meter beam and satisfied with it, but sure want to improve the performance on GMRS.
On UHF you really need to pay attention to coax loss.
Because RG8X has nearly 13dB loss for 100feet length on FRS/GMRS.
You can see on the 450MHz row: Communications Coax

Other item of concern when looking at ham antennas for GMRS in that ham antennas are only intended to run up to 450MHz. So you need to be concerned when running on 467MHz FRS frequencies.
__________________
"Y'all mind hanging back? You're jamming my frequencies" -- Tangina in Poltergeist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Worldwide Radio Forum