1. In celebration of the launch of the new redesigned site, we just gave away a FREE antenna! Click Here to See Who Won!

The Maco 3 element beam ?...

Discussion in 'CB Antennas' started by Oatmeal, Feb 19, 2012.

  1. Oatmeal

    Oatmeal Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    22
    What do you all think about one of these beams ?...
    How much power does the gamma match handle that comes with it ?..


     
    #1
  2. GnG8d

    GnG8d Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,037
    Likes Received:
    316
    I wouldn't bother for less than a 4 element.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    #2
  3. Highlander_821

    Highlander_821 Amour d'Ecosse

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    14
    A good product for a fair price. They can even be turned with a cheap TV rotor. Not sure on the gamma power handling, but it is surely in the thousands.
     
    #3
  4. hotrod

    hotrod Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,110
    Likes Received:
    118
    good little beam. i believe it will handle 1.5kw i think but copper.com has
    other gamma matches for it .5kw,10kw,and 30kw so i think they,ll handle
    quite a bit power
     
    #4
  5. Robb

    Robb Yup

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    8,207
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Hmmm . . . I like the statement: 'Any beam is better than no beam'. But yes, a 4 element will still work with a TV rotor, especially the Sirio 4 element beam. It weighs only 13 lbs; a Maco will weigh twice as much. The Maco is built heavier for a tough environment/extreme weather. Dunno about the Maco, but the Sirio is supposed to handle 500 watts continuous and 1kw PEP
     
    #5
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2012
  6. 2RT307

    2RT307 Sr. Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,361
    Likes Received:
    266
    If you have the space, and can afford a bigger/better rotor, definitely get the 4 element. Great beam! Do the Scott's specs from Signal Engineering, and you won't regret it.

    If you can't do the above, the 3 element will do ya pretty good. Put her on the flat side, and put a ground plane over it. :)

    And another one to consider, the V Quad is really a pretty darned good performer. You don't hear many guys running them, but they are a strong value performance wise. TV rotor will spin it. I think cbradiomagazine.com did a review.

    73,
    RT307
     
    #6
  7. Henry HPSD

    Henry HPSD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    404
    Likes Received:
    109
    Hello,

    At the bottum of this page :
    All about antennas
    At the left side you can find the eznec plots of the Maco 3 and Maco 4 elements yagi.

    There is about 1 dB gain difference between them, and the front to back of the 3 el is better.
    However the front to rear of the 4el wins again.

    I have written down on this forum dimensions for the 3 (or) 4 el to improve things.
    http://www.worldwidedx.com/cb-antennas/133137-4-element-yagi-specs-3.html
    That will also get better performance compared to the signal engineering one.

    The remark "not to bother with less than a 4el" is one i disagree with.

    For DXing horizontal beam antennas provide additional groundgain.
    This is much more than a vertical will provide.
    For DXing a high placed beam (also the smallest one like a moxon) will beat the vertical and be a major improvement.
    That high placed posistion will probarbly also mean the take off angle is much lower, hence less "hops". (Unless you have your vertical placed over a salt sea for example.)


    Henry HPSD
    19SD348
     
    #7

Share This Page