Go Back   Worldwide DX Amateur Radio Forums - Ham - CB - HF - VHF - UHF > Amateur Radio Related > VHF/UHF Bands and VHF/UHF Rigs


Amateur Callsign Lookup
Enter Callsign:

How To: Use crossband repeat legally on your base station

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-03-2009, 08:03 PM
C2's Avatar
C2 C2 is offline
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,937
C2 is on a distinguished road
Default


It is necessary because if Moleculo TX's his call on 2m, his call is then TX on his base at 440.

The problem is that if I am listening to his comms, I cannot tell who is the control op of the repeater.

I may hear both parties plus the repeater and there is no way I could tell who is the control op of the repeater until Moldy's call comes out over 440 on his repeater;

otherwise, it is just an unidentified repeater...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Worldwide Radio Forum
  #32  
Old 10-04-2009, 12:48 AM
Supporting Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 60
ke7vvt is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C2 View Post
It is necessary because if Moleculo TX's his call on 2m, his call is then TX on his base at 440.
Oh ya, good idea. That would do it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by C2 View Post
The problem is that if I am listening to his comms, I cannot tell who is the control op of the repeater.

I may hear both parties plus the repeater and there is no way I could tell who is the control op of the repeater until Moldy's call comes out over 440 on his repeater;

otherwise, it is just an unidentified repeater...
Right. I see your concern.

As "Moldy" puts it though, no one but he and his select followers would even know that it is a reapeater. If all things are functioning correctly, no one would ever be able to tell unless they were tuned into all 3 frequencies. Then they might be able to piece together what was going on, but I think the only conclusion would be is, "Hey, this guy is clever".

Playing the "rules are sufficiently worded" for interpretation card and continue operations sounds like a safe bet. If there is an "auto-id" feature on the repeater station, no harm in using it right?

Mole gets clever points for figuring a way around the id for the 440.00 repeater (or being ballsy enough to just say it like it is). If you are confident that setup is working right and the repeater is not causing some unidentifiable interference, the ID from the HT on 440.00 sounds good.

I would take the easy way out though. Leave the repeater on low power for the 440 side and ID like C2 says on the 2m side. Then you don't need to have the second antenna or duplexer.

Huh. Pretty interesting stuff. I had no idea how or what this cross-band repeater business was until reading here. Turns out it is something I can definitely use.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-04-2009, 08:43 PM
C2's Avatar
C2 C2 is offline
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,937
C2 is on a distinguished road
Default

I honestly mean no offence to Moleculo ("Moldy"); so perhaps I took my liberties too loosly?

Anyway...

I still feel the context of the thread places its content into question.

We have only TWO frequencies. One on 2m and one on 70cm. Anyone within range of the 70cm repeater or HT will likely be able to hear both parties on both 2m and 70cm simplex. It would be impossible to tell who is the control op of the repeater, unless specifically identified by some other means.

Think about it. At that point, it is an unidentified repeater. I remember that my HT, from indoors, was received 5/9 from over 2 miles away when set to 1/2 watt. (and if Mole is that close to his repeater, he could also just set his HT to 2m receive and run the 70cm repeater output into an isolated load)

I'm not saying Mole is not clever; he sure is a nice, straight forward and trustworthy fellow, but I believe, aside from some ambiguity in the rules, he is not technically legal.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
crossband repeat, crossband repeat setup


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ANNUAL ARMED FORCES DAY CROSSBAND EVENT moleculo Announcements & Open Forum 1 04-21-2009 06:58 AM
Here's another $10,000 fine to a CBer! C W Morse FCC & ARRL Activity 7 04-20-2008 07:37 AM
Remember: You MUST allow your Station to be Inspected! C W Morse FCC & ARRL Activity 0 06-08-2007 10:59 AM
IF They Ask to Inspect your station..................... C W Morse FCC & ARRL Activity 1 07-20-2005 09:15 PM
Marine Radio Rules Charger383 Scanning & Shortwave Listening 0 07-07-2002 08:12 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Worldwide Radio Forum