Go Back   Worldwide DX Amateur Radio Forums - Ham - CB - HF - VHF - UHF > Amateur Radio Related > VHF/UHF Bands and VHF/UHF Rigs


Amateur Callsign Lookup
Enter Callsign:

How To: Use crossband repeat legally on your base station

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2009, 03:30 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,156
moleculo has disabled reputation
Default How To: Use crossband repeat legally on your base station


Many VHF/UHF mobile and base rigs provide the ability to crossband repeat - that is, to fully duplex, automatically repeat what is heard on 2 meters onto a 440mhz frequency and vice-versa. If you've never used this type of functionality or are just new to the whole concept, you might be thinking, "what does this do for me?" If you own an HT and also have a VHF/UHF rig with crossband repeat (or are considering purchasing a VHF/UHF rig for the house) wouldn't you like to have the freedom to move around the house & yard while talking to your buddies on the radio, but use the power and antenna capabilities of a base station? That's what crossband repeat can do for you.

You'll notice that I used the word "legally" in the thread title. The usage of this functionality has caused quite a bit of controversy for several reasons. The FCC requirements that are relevant to this discussion are that the Control Operator must ID every 10 minutes on all frequencies being transmitted on, remote stations must have ID timers, and remote stations must have a way to remotely control or shut them off. The latter two of the three requirements mentioned are the easiest to satisfy. Simply put, if you are capable of walking over to the rig doing the crossband repeating, it is under your direct control. You don't need a ID timer and you can just simply turn it off whenever you need to. The requirement to ID on every frequency is the tricky one to satisfy.

For the uninitiated, let's first go over the fundamental setup and concepts in play. The typical use-case scenario for this setup is like this:

Base Antenna <--> 2m <--> VHF/UHF Rig <--> 440mhz <--> HT

Anything that is heard on the Base Antenna on 2m, is picked up by the VHF/UHF Rig and broadcast simultaneously on 440mhz where the HT is listening. Conversly, anthing that is transmitted by the HT on 440mhz is picked up by the VHF/UHF Rig where it is simultaneously transmitted using the Base Antenna on 2m. You can probably now see the advantage of going through this excercise. You have the flexibility of moving aroud with the HT, but the power output and reception of the vhf/uhf rig and base antenna.

When you give your callsign using your voice on the HT, it will be transmitted out on both the 440mhz and 2m frequencies. When another station talking back to you IDs, it will also be sent on the 2m and 440 frequencies. Here's where it is easy to violate the intent of the FCC regulations: Let's say you have the UHF side of the rig set on full power. If your base antenna is a 2m/440 antenna, when the other station that you're talkign to ID's, it is being rebroadcast on 440Mhz at 35watts (probably) over a base antenna. No problem. However, when you ID on your HT, it is only being broadcast at 5 watts over a little rubber ducky on UHF. The VHF side gets the full 50 watts of the VHF/UHF rig and the power of the base antenna, but the 440mhz side only used your HT. Distant stations monitoring the 440mhz side will probably never hear your callsign. This is the problem that must be corrected to keep you legal.

Some of the newer crossband repeat rigs can auto-id on the 440 side while crossband repeating using CW. This makes the whole problem moot. However, for the vast majority of rigs that don't do this, there is a very simple way to solve this problem to keep you from getting written up by an "Official Observer". Simply put, the solution involves doing two things: 1. Reducing the power output of the VHF/UHF rig on the 440Mhz side and, 2. changing the antenna system used on the UHF side of the crossband repeater.

Step 1 is easy: Just turn the UHF power output on the crossband repeater to it's lowest setting. Most, if not all crossband repeat rigs have seperate power output settings for each band. The lowest power output setting for UHF is usually around 5 watts. However, if you're transmitting 5 watts into a base 440mhz antenna, your range will still be far greater than the 5 watts coming out of your HT duckie antenna. That's why you need step 2.

Step 2: Between the base antenna and the crossband repeater, install a VHF/UHF duplexer right at the rig. On the 2m side, attach the feedline for your 2m base antenna. On the 440 side install a very small antenna that will limit the range of your crossband repeater. I use a small 1/4 wave 440mhz rare earth gumdrop magmount antenna stuck on a piece of metal that is sitting on my window sill. The 1/4 wave 440 mhz antenna is only about 6 inches long. That, coupled with the feedline loss in the cheap coax on the magmount and the signal loss from passing through my house and adjacent houses gives my crossband repeat station an effective range of about 6 blocks. Your distance may vary based on your surroundings. Now I know that when I ID on my HT, the signal output from the HT on the 440mhz frequency is being carried farther than when the crossband repeater transmitts on 440. When I really want to reduce the effective range of the 440mhz side, I use a dummy load set on the floor for the 440mhz antenna on the crossband repeater. The dummy load still radiates a little and also receives my 440mhz HT transmissions, but the effective range is now reduced to about 1 house on either side of my own, if that.

Measuring the effective range of the crossband repeater is pretty simple also. Just set it up and find someone to talk to on 2m. Now start walking away from your station with your HT while having your conversation. When the other station starts to crackle and get hard to understand, you're reaching the end of your range. Now just ask yourself (or get a friend to help you) if your HT can be heard by itself on 440mhz back to your base from where you're at. If it can be, then you've met the requirement that you have ID'd on every frequency and any station that can hear the transmission from your crossband repeater can also hear your HT.

When setting up your crossband repeat base station there are a few other considerations worth mentioning. First, make sure you're using a 440mhz frequency that isn't allocated to something else nearby. If you've greatly reduced the effective range of the 440mhz side as suggested, this is not nearly that big of an issue but you should still do a little homework. Secondly, make sure you use a CTCSS tone or DCS code between your HT and crossband repeater. This will make it so someone won't accidentally get into your crossband repeater and unkowningly transmit on 440mhz. Also remember to turn the system off when not in use so that crossband repeater doesn't pick up traffic on 2m and start repeating it on 440mhz while you're not around to ID every 10 minutes.

I've been using this setup for years in the busy Los Angeles metro area with no problems. If you haven't thought about setting this up, give it a try and free yourself from your desk .
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Worldwide Radio Forum
  #2  
Old 09-24-2009, 05:22 PM
C2's Avatar
C2 C2 is offline
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,937
C2 is on a distinguished road
Default

I think the antenna that spawns your signal must also be the source for your ID, as the antenna is an integral part of your station.

Aside from what you are doing here, what you are saying is that I can tx on my HT, then run over to my mobile and ID and that is OK since my mobile has more power.

What if I had two HTs and I tx on one and then every 10 minutes pick up the other just to ID; is that OK?

Another thought, if I tx to a repeater with tone and then ID without tone (repeater does not key), is that OK?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-24-2009, 06:25 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 142
KD8LWX is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you &

Is there any reason why this couldn't be setup be setup as
2M and 2M
or
2M and 6M
or
2M and HF
or
440 and HF
or
440 and 6M?

I assume that the 440 band allows less distance?

If I understand you correctly there is no legal way to setup a temporary repeater for a group of friends, correct?

Please name a few rigs which can be setup as repeaters.
__________________
CISA, CISSP, Computer geek
clueless about HAM

www.linkedin.com/in/dariandunn
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-24-2009, 09:28 PM
C2's Avatar
C2 C2 is offline
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,937
C2 is on a distinguished road
Default

you can legally set up a temporary repeater, as long as it follows the ID requirements and you have a way to control the repeater either remotely or directly.

This is called an uncoordinated repeater and as long as it does not interfere, it is fine.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-24-2009, 11:23 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,156
moleculo has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C2 View Post
I think the antenna that spawns your signal must also be the source for your ID, as the antenna is an integral part of your station.

Aside from what you are doing here, what you are saying is that I can tx on my HT, then run over to my mobile and ID and that is OK since my mobile has more power.

What if I had two HTs and I tx on one and then every 10 minutes pick up the other just to ID; is that OK?

Another thought, if I tx to a repeater with tone and then ID without tone (repeater does not key), is that OK?

Specifically,
Quote:
§97.119 Station identification.

(a) Each amateur station, except a space station or telecommand station, must transmit its assigned call sign on its transmitting channel at the end of each communication, and at least every ten minutes during a communication, for the purpose of clearly making the source of the transmissions from the station known to those receiving the transmissions. No station may transmit unidentified communications or signals, or transmit as the station call sign, any call sign not authorized to the station.
It doesn't say anywhere that the call sign sent on the transmitted channel must be using a common antenna. This example illuminates one of the biggest problems (in my opinion) of amateur radio: everyone reads into the rules what they want to believe is correct instead of just reading the regulations as they are written.

It says that the purpose of the call sign transmission is to "clearly make the source of the transmissions...known to those receiving the transmissions". It doesn't matter how you do this as long as any station receiving the transmission knows its source. This is why you need to make sure that your HT is able to TX the same distance as the crossband repeat rig; that insures that the source of the transmission is always able to be identified.

The issue of TX'ing into a repeater using a tone and then ID'ing without a tone is pretty much irrelevant because any station can choose to receive all transmissions regardless of the accompanying tone. The ID'ing station is still sending its call sign, but the receiving station chooses to hear it based on whether or not they are using the CTCSS tone. The FCC rules are clear: you just need to ID on the frequency in use...it says nothing about accompanying tones.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-24-2009, 11:32 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,156
moleculo has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KD8LWX View Post
Thank you &

Is there any reason why this couldn't be setup be setup as
2M and 2M
or
2M and 6M
or
2M and HF
or
440 and HF
or
440 and 6M?

Please name a few rigs which can be setup as repeaters.
There isn't a "legal" reason why you couldn't do the things listed, but there are technical and cost reasons. The most common method desired is to use 2m/440, so that is why you see rigs that can do it on those bands. The Kenwood TS-2000 can do it between several bands, which is pretty neat.

Some current rigs that can do this:

Yaesu FT-8800r
Yaeus FT-8900r
Icom 2820h
Kenwood TS-2000
Alinco DR-635
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-25-2009, 10:04 AM
C2's Avatar
C2 C2 is offline
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,937
C2 is on a distinguished road
Default

I consider a "station" as inclusive of the antenna AND exclusive of other stations; i.e., two HTs constitute two different stations and each must ID their transmissions.

In your case, I belive that the base station must ID on 440, even if you have crippled the base station's antenna and presume that your HT (many feet away) will cover the same TX range. The first part of this statement is also important, "No station may transmit unidentified communications or signals, or transmit as the station call sign, any call sign not authorized to the station."

I do not believe that I could set up my base station to auto ID every 10 minutes and then walk around my property all day TXing on my HT and never ID, and still be legal, even if it was all done on the same frequency.



The reason I asked about IDing without a tone when using a repeater (presumably one that requires a tone) is because then the repeater would not TX your ID, even though you were using the repeater. This would kink the other users as well as defeat the "intent" clause in your argument.

I don't believe either is an accepted practice as one defies the literal definition and the other defies the purpose of the definition.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-25-2009, 11:37 AM
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,156
moleculo has disabled reputation
Default

I disagree completely. Look at it this way: I have two HF antennas installed that cover some of the same bands. I have a coax switch that allows me to switch back and forth between them depending on which one I feel like using. If I apply your reasoning, then I must make sure I ID on each antenna I talk on. However, If I'm talking on one antenna and then start talking to a different station and switch antennas because it allows me to hear that station better, there is no requirement that I switch back the first antenna I started on and ID there within ten minutes.

If that interpretation applies to one scenario, it has to apply to all scenarios which just is not the case.

Your "station" is not defined as a piece of a equipment as you defined it. It is a location and it encompasses all of your equipment at that location.

Quote:
(a) The definitions of terms used in Part 97 are:

(1) Amateur operator. A person named in an amateur operator/primary license station grant on the ULS consolidated licensee database to be the control operator of an amateur station. (2) Amateur radio services. The amateur service, the amateur-satellite service and the radio amateur civil emergency service.
(4) Amateur service. A radiocommunication service for the purpose of self-training, intercommunication and technical investigations carried out by amateurs, that is, duly authorized persons interested in radio technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest.
(5) Amateur station. A station in an amateur radio service consisting of the apparatus necessary for carrying on radiocommunications.
(...)
(16) Earth station. An amateur station located on, or within 50 km of the Earth's surface intended for communications with space stations or with other Earth stations by means of one or more other objects in space.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-25-2009, 12:47 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 142
KD8LWX is on a distinguished road
Default

Please verify that the Yaesu 817, 857, 897 do not have this capability.
__________________
CISA, CISSP, Computer geek
clueless about HAM

www.linkedin.com/in/dariandunn
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-25-2009, 01:34 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,156
moleculo has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KD8LWX View Post
Please verify that the Yaesu 817, 857, 897 do not have this capability.
They do not.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
crossband repeat, crossband repeat setup


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ANNUAL ARMED FORCES DAY CROSSBAND EVENT moleculo Announcements & Open Forum 1 04-21-2009 06:58 AM
Here's another $10,000 fine to a CBer! C W Morse FCC & ARRL Activity 7 04-20-2008 07:37 AM
Remember: You MUST allow your Station to be Inspected! C W Morse FCC & ARRL Activity 0 06-08-2007 10:59 AM
IF They Ask to Inspect your station..................... C W Morse FCC & ARRL Activity 1 07-20-2005 09:15 PM
Marine Radio Rules Charger383 Scanning & Shortwave Listening 0 07-07-2002 08:12 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Worldwide Radio Forum