• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.

Galaxy radio drift

Larry A McClanahan

Active Member
Jun 19, 2018
176
71
38
73
Gentleman, I believe I have found the cause and the Cure for the Galaxy radio drift.
I will use the clarifier on the ranger 2950 versus the Galaxy dx2547 for instruction purposes. The Galaxy's all use a zener diode in its clarifier section that is an SVC 251. It has a rollback voltage of minimum 12 volts. That means that at 12 volts or higher it becomes unstable. The ranger has a svc201 which does not become unstable until 16 volts or higher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shadetree Mechanic

Agree, misspoke but going the try one. Will keep you posted. It's pretty much the only component in there that's different so to speak. Going to give it a shot on my 959 and see if it solves the problem.
 
Didn't several older Galaxy radios use dual Varactor? One offset the other...

Galaxy33HMLVCO.jpg

Then there is also the Clarifier section too...
SVC251.jpg
At least you can see all the parts and every one of them has one type of impact or another in how well the circuit can stay on frequency.

Didn't know if anyone caught this but the clarifier is buffered in the circuit by R150 and R157 - to isolate the interaction from the externals - will still have drift but clarifier "floats" after all the signal cleanup by C127, C132 and R153 ... weighted, smoothed and RF removed - sort of thing...

:+> Andy <+:
 
The dual varactor is needed to get the incredibly wide coverage range you need for 8 bands. You won't see that in a 40-channel radio.

I'll guess that two varactors in parallel was cheaper than a single part that has enough tuning range by itself.

I used a single varactor in the 21 MHz PLL we used to sell for the Browning Mark 4 transmitter. The 16 MHz version we made for the Mark 3 transmitter used two of the same varactor in parallel. Needed the extra capacitance at the lower frequency. It was cheaper for me to use two of the same part than to buy two different types, one for each model.

73
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larry A McClanahan
Same circuit, different capacitor in the 2950 versus the dx959. And different diode. I have a junk 2950 that I will take the parts out of.
Didn't several older Galaxy radios use dual Varactor? One offset the other...

View attachment 24843

Then there is also the Clarifier section too...
View attachment 24844
At least you can see all the parts and every one of them has one type of impact or another in how well the circuit can stay on frequency.

Didn't know if anyone caught this but the clarifier is buffered in the circuit by R150 and R157 - to isolate the interaction from the externals - will still have drift but clarifier "floats" after all the signal cleanup by C127, C132 and R153 ... weighted, smoothed and RF removed - sort of thing...

:+> Andy <+:
What radio is that from Andy?
 
Interesting discovery. I pulled the two parts out of the parts radio, 2950 Ranger. They do not even use the SVC201 that the schematics indicate. There is a glass diode in it's place. I cannot read the numbers. I am going to take it by the jewelry shop tomorrow and have them use their magnifying abilities to tell me what the number is.
I believe this is going to stabilize the frequency on the clarifier circuit. But there is another problem that also causes drift. Heat. Heatsink on the back of the radio that I'm using as a test bed solves that problem. I would like to install the diode right now but I need to take it to the jeweler to find out what it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shadetree Mechanic

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • dxBot:
    Tucker442 has left the room.
  • @ BJ radionut:
    LIVE 10:00 AM EST :cool:
  • @ Charles Edwards:
    I'm looking for factory settings 1 through 59 for a AT 5555 n2 or AT500 M2 I only wrote down half the values feel like a idiot I need help will be appreciated