• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.

King of the toroid

Snap them ferrites onto the diesel fuel return line. Magnets on the feed line.

Think my F.A.S.S. would reject any ionic disturbances, even though ferrites may look like a magnets they are not. They do decent job of stopping some of the RF interference along that coax, used to run one between radio and leeenyer, and one or two between leeenyer and antenna before I changed my coax to BuryFlex. Had done all the bonding possible and the only resort was TOROIDS.

Now if I do get some diesel contamination due to spurious RF emotions :p, I may give that a try. Also could try using a choke method on that return line there........just try tying it a knot. Wouldn't want any those spurious RF emotions returning to the fuel tank and contaminating the rest of the diesel population.....:whistle::whistle::whistle:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slowmover
I didn't say it was a waste of money. I said I hope it was. What I mean by that is I hope lightning never strikes the tower.

I'm sorry, I misread your comment.

I have three ground rods at the base of my tower but they are for lightning. I hope I never need them and they were a waste of money.

Probably due a little lack of punctuation.
Kind of like ......
"Helping my Uncle Jack, off a horse." .and........"Helping my uncle jack off a horse."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 543_Dallas
When I first got into CB and got my hands on my first amp I had rfi hell in my mobile. It was an old pickup truck with an antenna mounted on a headache rack.

I went down to the hardware store and bought some heavy duty stranded wire and ran myself an "rf ground" down to the frame. It solved my problem, swr was good, the mic didn't burn my lips anymore and life was good. It took a few years before I figured out what I actually did. That radial would have probably worked better if I tied it off to the tailgate.

That there my friend is called bonding. Using braid is the preferred method for taking all body panels to the frame. But I just use #6 stranded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slowmover
That there my friend is called bonding. Using braid is the preferred method for taking all body panels to the frame. But I just use #6 stranded.

I ran a 6 foot piece of wire from the antenna mount to the frame. That's not really bonded at 27mhz. I thought I knew what I was doing because the symptoms went away.
 
From your attitude you must be the guy that did the video. :ROFLMAO: Ferrites are useful in some cases however it is always best to cure the problem rather than treat it. The guy in the video gives the impression ferrites are the be-all and end-all when in fact they should be used as a last resort. That is why the members were poking fun at him. Better grounding and shielding is the way to go for starts.
From your attitude you must be the guy that did the video. :ROFLMAO: Ferrites are useful in some cases however it is always best to cure the problem rather than treat it. The guy in the video gives the impression ferrites are the be-all and end-all when in fact they should be used as a last resort. That is why the members were poking fun at him. Better grounding and shielding is the way to go for starts.[/
 
Captain kilowatt, what do you mean by my attitude? Have you quizzed any other members on this in regard to this discussion? I don't like to see this kind of culture anywhere. That is namely the one where people ridicule a defenceless person and pretend to know everything. I don't claim to know everything, but what I do know is that there were a couple of good examples of effective use of ferrites in his vid. Sure, there were quite a few you may question, however, is it so simple as to say ferrites are a band aid solution and that's it! For instance, my friend was having issues with the neighbours solar panels, they were generating a lot of rfi. Do you think he offered to replace his entire solar system to solve the problem? No, it was fixed quite simply, you know how, and it works both ways. I employ well designed ferrite chokes to prevent common mode current, I do not have all of these rf grounding crap that you all seem to talk about a lot, and I do more than well without any problems. I have some grounding at the base of my antenna purely for lightning, some members seem to be confused by this. So you mention your grounding and shielding, care to enlighten me on this?
 
Ferrites have worked for me.

On radio power leads as well as on a portable refrigerator/freezer where the RF was so bad during compressor run-time I’d turn off the radio.

Maybe in a stationary base other approaches are better. And on a vehicle I own. I’m free to try everything.

On a company truck there winds up being limitations in access, etc. so I’ll try ferrites. If it doesn’t work, on to the next idea.

At present I’d like to have the power leads under 25’. 6-ga. They go past all sorts of devices.

Bit by bit, piece by piece.
 
I've had the most luck using them for common mode chokes. Especially in mobile installs. There isn't enough room to wrap a coax choke in the headliner when installing a puck mount. I'll use a stack of them around the coax right at the feed point. Probably not necessary for a few hundred watts but a few kilowatts is a different story.

I have some on my xlr mic cable where it connects to the audio gear. They aren't needed at less that a kw carrier. It wasn't an issue with a condenser mic but had issues when I switched to the pr40. I suspect it was because the mic preamp level had to be increased and the preamp doesn't play well with rf.

Some amplifiers don't have enough power cable isolation and you'll have stray rf from the power cables. Ferrite works well here also.
 
Captain kilowatt, what do you mean by my attitude? Have you quizzed any other members on this in regard to this discussion? I don't like to see this kind of culture anywhere. That is namely the one where people ridicule a defenceless person and pretend to know everything. I don't claim to know everything, but what I do know is that there were a couple of good examples of effective use of ferrites in his vid. Sure, there were quite a few you may question, however, is it so simple as to say ferrites are a band aid solution and that's it! For instance, my friend was having issues with the neighbours solar panels, they were generating a lot of rfi. Do you think he offered to replace his entire solar system to solve the problem? No, it was fixed quite simply, you know how, and it works both ways. I employ well designed ferrite chokes to prevent common mode current, I do not have all of these rf grounding crap that you all seem to talk about a lot, and I do more than well without any problems. I have some grounding at the base of my antenna purely for lightning, some members seem to be confused by this. So you mention your grounding and shielding, care to enlighten me on this?

Who's got their knickers in a bunch?

I didn't make fun of his video to make myself feel superior, i made fun of it because it was funny.

If his intention was to teach someone how to wrap wires around a donut, then he did that.
If his intention was to teach people what wrapping wires in ferrite actually does, or why you would or would not choose that method to solve your rfi problems, then he did not do any of that.

This guy is not running dirty CB amplifiers and clipped modulation limiters, he is running amateur radio gear, and he is getting into everything in his house, and even his neighbor's house.

nowhere in the video does he describe his station, his grounding setup, or his antenna, nor does he show us why he didn't start there to solve his problem.

he could just be doing something dumb like operating from his 2nd floor and running 30 feet of wire down to a ground rod, or not tying his station ground in with his home electrical ground.

If he was doing either of those things and thought that he had solved his rfi problems just because he's not bleeding on the telephone anymore, then he is the one who needs a lesson.

Now here you are assuming that we are just a bunch of jerks who make fun of people that are trying to fix their problems, and that we don't know what we are talking about.

you should do yourself a favor and start searching around the past posts in this forum.

we have covered grounding for lightning, rf grounding, vehicle bonding, NEC conformation, and just about anything else that involves copper, and we have run those subjects right into the ground. pun intended.

If you would like some specific help with an issue you are having at your station, there are many of us who love to help, just start a thread and ask.
LC
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redbeard U812
Aluminum foil is not just for making hats anymore. Here is the section on ground system testing from Radio Works.

http://www.radioworks.com/nbgnd.html

A ground system test

OK, so you have a good ground system set up, all the ground wires are short, all the ground loops have been minimized. Can the system be improved? Probably, and here is a quick and simple way to find out. This test is especially good for checking out radial systems for verticals and ground systems on boats.

First, purchase two, inexpensive, 75' rolls of aluminum foil. Unroll about 8 feet of foil from each roll and lay in on the ground, the rolls forming a 90 degree angle to one another. Twist the first foot of foil into a thick, aluminum wire. Then twist the two twisted ends of the foil together. Use a short clip lead or other attachment method and connect the foil to the ground system. Even better, connect a length of ground braid and route it directly to the point on the transmatch in the shack. Measure your antenna's SWR with and without the foil ground hooked up. It shouldn't make any difference. If it does, then you need a better ground system. Repeat this procedure for each band, unrolling the length of the foil so it is 1/4 wavelength long for the band being tested. If your ground system is working well, there will be no difference in SWR readings.

There are other ways to make this measurement beside looking for changes in SWR. If you have an RF ammeter, (the MFJ-931 has one built-in) connect it in series with the station ground at the transmitter. Use the aluminum foil procedure outlined above. Any change in RF ground current indicates an inadequate ground system. The MFJ RF 'Current Probe' should work as well and does not have to be placed in series with the ground systems.

The foil technique works well with vertical antennas. Roll out a coupe of lengths of foil for a particular band, connect to the base of the vertical in parallel with the radial system. If the SWR changes, the radial system could use some improvement.

Note: With an improved ground system, you may see the SWR rise slightly. Remember, a properly installed 1/4 wave vertical with low I2R losses will have a feedpoint impedance around 30 - 35 ohms. The lowest SWR you will see if everything is working perfectly is 1.5:1. Trap verticals are certainly no better than a good, full-size, 1/4 wave vertical. So, don't be surprised to see the SWR increase as the ground losses are reduced.
 
Captain kilowatt, what do you mean by my attitude? Have you quizzed any other members on this in regard to this discussion? I don't like to see this kind of culture anywhere. That is namely the one where people ridicule a defenceless person and pretend to know everything. I don't claim to know everything, but what I do know is that there were a couple of good examples of effective use of ferrites in his vid. Sure, there were quite a few you may question, however, is it so simple as to say ferrites are a band aid solution and that's it! For instance, my friend was having issues with the neighbours solar panels, they were generating a lot of rfi. Do you think he offered to replace his entire solar system to solve the problem? No, it was fixed quite simply, you know how, and it works both ways. I employ well designed ferrite chokes to prevent common mode current, I do not have all of these rf grounding crap that you all seem to talk about a lot, and I do more than well without any problems. I have some grounding at the base of my antenna purely for lightning, some members seem to be confused by this. So you mention your grounding and shielding, care to enlighten me on this?

Oh please.....spare me the "you're only picking on me and nobody else" routine. Apparently you have not seen much in your 2 1/2 years here and only 3 posts as of the other day. If you don't like "to see this kind of culture anywhere" you are going to have a REALLY hard time on the internet discussion forums and social media then. That's the problem today......nobody can make a joking comment about something without offending someone. Too bad. Well I don't like the comment you made referring to grounding and shielding as "crap". I guess that's the former occupation I had for 22 years coming out in me. I saw for myself what PROPER grounding and shielding does when I was in commercial broadcasting dealing with everything from audio up to 1.7GHz. We had large toroids on the incoming coaxial and hardline cables for lightning protection as well as on the power lines for the same reason. That was it. PROPER single point grounds using wide copper flashing were used along with shielded audio and control lines. No toroids anywhere else in the systems whether AM or FM transmitter sites and never an issue. Those very same grounding techniques used at an AM site can be implemented in a typical amateur station with minimal cost if you do it right the first time. It is far from crap to do it that way. My own amateur station has six ground rods at the tower base......two for each leg.....and all connected together at the base. Transmission lines are grounded at point of entry and the station ground is tied into the main electrical service ground to create a single ground point to eliminate current flow from one ground to the other during a lightning strike event where the charge flows outward thru the ground creating a difference in potential between two distant ground points. Any audio lines or control lines I use are shielded. The control line to the remote coax switch is shielded 6-wire. Again no toroids anywhere. Will I ever HAVE to install some? Maybe and if Ineed too I will but for now things are great and there is no RFI at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redbeard U812
'bout time somebody got it right.

Been trying to pound that into people's heads for years. A lot of amateurs stop adding ground radials when the SWR on their ground mounted vertical hit 1:1. I tell them to keep going until they see something more like 1.4:1 or so or better yet use an analyzer to watch the impedance and shoot for 32-36 ohms. The small SWR is nothing and the antenna will be much more efficient.
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • dxBot:
    Tucker442 has left the room.
  • @ BJ radionut:
    LIVE 10:00 AM EST :cool:
  • @ Charles Edwards:
    I'm looking for factory settings 1 through 59 for a AT 5555 n2 or AT500 M2 I only wrote down half the values feel like a idiot I need help will be appreciated