That's why they don't teach much history today. We are suppose to forget about past lies so they can be reused on the next generation. I remember when they told Regain "just pass amnesty for million of illegals and then we'll talk about border security." Identical to Nancy and Chuck telling the president, "Just open the government and then we'll talk about a barrier". If there was any chance these two were honestly willing to work any deal out to protect us, then why are they only offering that chance AFTER all leverage is removed? When you listen to their words and watch their faces, it's apparent neither one even puts any effort into being a convincing lair anymore. I suppose that's difficult to do when their entire public opinion on the topic had to be reversed as soon as they realized we finally had a President who would follow through with border security. The amount of effort put into telling us how ineffective walls are was ridiculous. As though we required someone else to let us know if walls reduce the flow of undesired migration and could be satisfied with their most illogical explanation. All they want to do is insure the President has as little success as possible so they can all say he didn't keep his promises and gain obedient voters. Most people see through this like a plate glass window and place the blame on the opposition. Don't expect that blame to shift unless the President gives up on keeping his promises. The two situations are vastly different and this guy doesn't give up easy.