“Police” are accountable.
Effectively, there can be no evidence of crime without disinterested testimony, or chain-of-evidence matters per physical items. There WAS a reason for a police force.
Only tribalism from hereon.
Politicians run political cover from above to the criminal gangs from which they sprang.
Charitable grants of tax money to “community action” groups are the fig leaf. Salaried, titled criminals, now freed to turn their energy towards the wholly illegal profit-making activities for which they were hired. Eventually, this is every taxpayer-funded job in that locale. Can’t be otherwise.
This is the single function of NGO’s: taxpayer-subsidy for societal destruction. The wedge in the doorway.
No utility or business enterprise operates thereon without a kickback to sanctioned criminals. The bigger that concern (national or international) the more this favors them as it’s cheaper. Why do you think they support BLM, etc?
Respect for law — the open, accountable SYSTEM of justice (quaintly recalled as, due process of law) — and the desire to have but few laws in governance . . is a belief exclusive to right-wing “domestic terrorists”. Those deemed Deplorable.
Moral Agency is the accompanying belief that individuals are responsible for their own behavior. This is THE premise of court standing. One man versus (anyone or anything).
But (sigh) it’s logically incompatible with the 1619 dynamic in play; centuries of oppression has warped those victims. Genetically. Cannot be held accountable, thus. (Negroes or women or Jews).
One must have an educated citizenry of Western Christian belief for moral agency to work.
Honor is the spur to acceptance of agency. Women weren’t allowed to testify, much less vote — as physical weakness alone renders them incapable of the honesty required of men. (This is impartial; children also exempt). A handicapped man NOT exempt except via mental incapacitation.
“The vote” was an agreement to the cessation of physical warfare pending an election outcome (the strongest woman on Earth can be taken down by an average man; she cannot defend her vote. Nor should she be asked — much less forced — to do so. Her purpose is other).
Thus, why would you ever take orders from a woman? As she cannot, ipso facto, ever be held accountable? Same for minorities of any race.
No police?
Who will run referee on an honest election?
The NWO grabs another gear.
— Open declaration that your skin color is now your uniform. Unchanging. Permanent. The Mark of Cain. Guilt or innocence is by that association.
Lying, cheating, theft, etc, no longer exist. No longer exist between individuals. Except as members of competing groups.
Minneapolis = Mogadishu.
“What? You expected to have your day before an impartial court?
You expected AN ELECTION to be fair? Ha!”
Individuals capable of acting solely on their own recognizance = Unicorns. (Group member, only. Children, not Men).
Boys, the difference between, “better judged by twelve than carried by six, is gone
You might say, “well, that ain’t a’happenin’ ‘round here!”
Yeah? Prove it.
Maybe (likeliest) you’re paying for police to use the SWAT team to close a bar or barbershop . . . but stands aside while collecting overtime & hazard pay as looters (sorry, protestors) torch opponents businesses.
Minneapolis maybe should be congratulated for their honesty in lowering the tax burden. One you continue to pay.
Acts 18:6 “ . . on their heads, so be it”.
.