You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

Well guys the quote above is a post to BM where I told him about the model error I found with the original model I posted at the beginning of this thread. I fixed the radial length error I made to the model entitled (.625 wave x 105" radials 40') with 4 horizontal radials at 62" instead of 72". It was just a fluke error I made.

You will note that the model improved and this model shows to be even better, at 40', better than all the models with slanted down radials at the same height. This was my whole point in this model, to show the difference, and not show a best installation idea for the Imax. Only real world testing can prove that.

BTW, the recap report I posted in the beginning (my post #6) is still the best source of data that I did for this project.

Here is the new model, and I've added the currents tabular data to maybe help me explain what I see going on with the phase and currents for NB that might help us understand the cancellation ideas we think about with the 5/5 wave antenna. I added some notes that maybe will help in that understanding as I see it.

[ATTACH]7379[/ATTACH]

<blockquote data-quote="Marconi" data-source="post: 369231" data-attributes="member: 903">Well guys the quote above is a post to BM where I told him about the model error I found with the original model I posted at the beginning of this thread. I fixed the radial length error I made to the model entitled (.625 wave x 105&quot; radials 40&#039;) with 4 horizontal radials at 62&quot; instead of 72&quot;. It was just a fluke error I made.&nbsp;You will note that the model improved and this model shows to be even better, at 40&#039;, better than all the models with slanted down radials at the same height. This was my whole point in this model, to show the difference, and not show a best installation idea for the Imax. Only real world testing can prove that.&nbsp;BTW, the recap report I posted in the beginning (my post #6) is still the best source of data that I did for this project.&nbsp;Here is the new model, and I&#039;ve added the currents tabular data to maybe help me explain what I see going on with the phase and currents for NB that might help us understand the cancellation ideas we think about with the 5/5 wave antenna. I added some notes that maybe will help in that understanding as I see it.&nbsp;[ATTACH]7379[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Marconi, post: 369231, member: 903"] Well guys the quote above is a post to BM where I told him about the model error I found with the original model I posted at the beginning of this thread. I fixed the radial length error I made to the model entitled (.625 wave x 105" radials 40') with 4 horizontal radials at 62" instead of 72". It was just a fluke error I made. You will note that the model improved and this model shows to be even better, at 40', better than all the models with slanted down radials at the same height. This was my whole point in this model, to show the difference, and not show a best installation idea for the Imax. Only real world testing can prove that. BTW, the recap report I posted in the beginning [B][I](my post #6)[/I][/B] is still the best source of data that I did for this project. Here is the new model, and I've added the currents tabular data to maybe help me explain what I see going on with the phase and currents for NB that might help us understand the cancellation ideas we think about with the 5/5 wave antenna. I added some notes that maybe will help in that understanding as I see it. [ATTACH]7379.vB[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom