• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

http://www.seboldt.net/k0jd/mot-an762.pdf

http://www.om3bc.com/datasheets/mrf421.pdf


"The MRF421 with a specified power output of 100 W PEP

or CW is the largest of the three RF devices. The maximum

dissipation limit is 290 Watts, which means that the

continuous collector current could go as high as 21.3 A at

13.6 V operated into any load. The data sheet specifies 20 A;

this is actually limited by the current carrying capability of

the internal bonding wires. The values given are valid at a

25°C mount temperature."


Are you suggesting that the (admittedly dated) reference to the MRF421 as a 100 watt device is capable of in excess of 180 watts as a single ended device?




Helge did.


https://cache.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN749.pdf


So there are the combiners.


Now back to the MRF421. Even in a single frequency, tuned circuit, with adequate cooling I have never seen in excess of 110 watts for any length of time. I lived with this sand state for over two years. It's one of the few BJT's I actually know anything significant about. Even if you eliminate the broadband push pull losses you still have the losses in the combiner(s). TANSTAAFL. Any gains in single ended implementation (actually theoretically possible) result in minimal percentage gains in efficiency at the expense of bandwidth necessitated by higher "Q" . These gains in no way equal  half of the transistors useful output power.