You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.

Reply to thread

Message

It's agreed the model is still flawed. I'd like to see it represent the 90 degree phase shift in a collinear model and I believe DB said it does not. I still see success in learning about more than one current on the cone. Seeing we can form a 1/4 wave current with a peak in the center using a pair of currents. Learning that when extra wires are added around the cone for CMC to radiate in the model, gain goes up. I suspect as time permits we may see DB's model get closer. In the meantime these models have given us food for thought and opened insights to others that may not have been apparent before.

[QUOTE="Shockwave, post: 498512, member: 10882"] It's agreed the model is still flawed. I'd like to see it represent the 90 degree phase shift in a collinear model and I believe DB said it does not. I still see success in learning about more than one current on the cone. Seeing we can form a 1/4 wave current with a peak in the center using a pair of currents. Learning that when extra wires are added around the cone for CMC to radiate in the model, gain goes up. I suspect as time permits we may see DB's model get closer. In the meantime these models have given us food for thought and opened insights to others that may not have been apparent before. [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom