You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.

Reply to thread

Message

I'm not wanting to appear to be all fired up, but I feared you might get there should I post as I did. I did it anyway hoping it would clarify the distinction between what a load can read on an analyzer and/or meter, and whether that meant anything in terms of efficiency or performance. It appears to have had the result I was looking for in that you returned to post exactly what your test was hoping to discover, and what it was not designed to prove. This is good.
You know that I am an empiricist first of all - tasting is the proof of a pudding - so I have nothing but respect for what either of you are doing. But I also want there to be complete clarity as to what is actually going on, what might be going on, and what a test can or can not unequivocally prove.

I will do the test because I think it could lead to more learning discussion on the matter.

Thanks for sharing it with us. It is impossible to dispute what you showed us, now it is time to determine what it may or may not mean. Speculation helps to get us there.

<blockquote data-quote="HomerBB" data-source="post: 460905" data-attributes="member: 8569">I&#039;m not wanting to appear to be all fired up, but I feared you might get&nbsp; there should I post as I did. I did it anyway hoping it would clarify&nbsp; the distinction between what a load can read on an analyzer and/or&nbsp; meter, and whether that meant anything in terms of efficiency or&nbsp; performance. It appears to have had the result I was looking for in that&nbsp; you returned to post exactly what your test was hoping to discover, and&nbsp; what it was not designed to prove. This is good.You know that I am&nbsp; an empiricist first of all - tasting is the proof of a pudding - so I&nbsp; have nothing but respect for what either of you are doing. But I also&nbsp; want there to be complete clarity as to what is actually going on, what&nbsp; might be going on, and what a test can or can not unequivocally prove.I will do the test because I think it could lead to more learning discussion on the matter. Thanks&nbsp; for sharing it with us. It is impossible to dispute what you showed us,&nbsp; now it is time to determine what it may or may not mean. Speculation&nbsp; helps to get us there.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="HomerBB, post: 460905, member: 8569"] I'm not wanting to appear to be all fired up, but I feared you might get there should I post as I did. I did it anyway hoping it would clarify the distinction between what a load can read on an analyzer and/or meter, and whether that meant anything in terms of efficiency or performance. It appears to have had the result I was looking for in that you returned to post exactly what your test was hoping to discover, and what it was not designed to prove. This is good. You know that I am an empiricist first of all - tasting is the proof of a pudding - so I have nothing but respect for what either of you are doing. But I also want there to be complete clarity as to what is actually going on, what might be going on, and what a test can or can not unequivocally prove. I will do the test because I think it could lead to more learning discussion on the matter. Thanks for sharing it with us. It is impossible to dispute what you showed us, now it is time to determine what it may or may not mean. Speculation helps to get us there. [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom