Search results

thanks for trying but i dont think there own experience would be considered here when someone wants to disagree.when reading through many of the threads on here i have noticed that sometimes people will contradict themselves just to disagree with someone.back when i repaired radios and...

thanks booty that graph at the bottom left corner shows about 85 watts hmm.damn i have seen 2 pill 1446 amps do more that 120 watts with 4 watts input.

359 i think we shoul start a separate pep thread and get this party started lol:thumbup:

do not change a thing or you will be disappointed,do not unmod it do not put mosfets in it.you stated you get reports that your clear.that amp should do between 180-250 watts average power you should be close to target.toshiba transistors are underrated and 2290 are closer to 80-90 watts give or...

woohoo

imax 2000 top section 102 stainless bottom maco v 5/8 ground planes length 24 1/2 feet radiator 23 feet.:thumbup1:

first of all barely anyone owns both these antennas and anyone that has both have stated the imax worked better as far as your made up 90 percent is a figment of your imagination and my bandwidth is as stated 25.160 1.9 -26.965 1.2-27.555 1.0-28.500 1.8. so theres no small portion of that...

there is a pep movement going on all idiots band together now!

get a clue and quit spreading your false and worthless information!

hey you know why your average meter ignores it because its not f---in there maybe you should hook a capacitor up to your head to and amplify your mouth and run threw a meter!

hey maybe you could take that 50 volt cap out of your pep slug hook the coax to your mouth hook that 50 volt cap to your tongue and measure your modulation peaks of course you know your average meter wont pick it up,but that pep meter should do somersaults :lol::lol:

i think a few things may have been overlooked here.first you will need an swr meter to check your match.second you can always use a car battery to get you started.third them 102 in whips from rat shack can be used as a base antenna.i made a dipole antenna with two 8 foot pieces of wire and...

if i want to check my modulation i will use a modulation meter or a scope not a PEP meter!maybe you should take your own advise.:whistle:

i could have not said it any better! i have owned both of these antennas for several years and if the maco worked better i would put it back up but it does not hmm maybe its that extra 5 feet of length!theres a thought.

he does not know any better he listens to other people for his knowledge!pep the only true measurement of an am signal,man is that the most backwards thing i have ever heard!well i guess that guy with his one tube amp is really doing 15000 swinging forward to 25000 because bob says so!lets see...

imax 2000 is the best for the money hello>

my tests were performed at 50-100 miles but i am sure you have an answer for that espescially since you have not owned either antenna but go ahead respond.

i dont know where you come up with these figures but maybe you should actually test a maco againsts a imax 2000but thats ok because you will state that the 19.5 foot antenna performs better than the 24.5 foot antenna been there done that the funny thing about that is the imax is 5 feet taller...

pep is not any true measurement of anything if you want real figures you will test with average power only.seems no pep am readings halve any merit what so ever.pep(poor exaggerated power)true power is average.you could hook up an rfx 75 kit to a 29 and claim its doing 140 watts but actually its...

these are both good antennas as far as performance is concerned.as for construction well they are both ok the imax at 24 feet is wobbly but always seems to come back the maco at 19 1/2 is a bit flimsy,the loop has a hose clamp and the rest of the clamps are crap and if you dont really tighten...