• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

Dipole Leg Direction

I'd like some clarification on the leg direction of dipoles. I may need to erect a dipole with the legs going in different directions, IE one leg going south and one leg going east (and somewhat sloping ala inverted V). To my understanding that is OK as long as I keep 90 degrees between the two directions. What does that do to the directivity of the dipole? I guess I'd mostly like to run my gain east/west.

My antenna modelling skills are somewhat limited, but to give you an idea of what would happen to a 10m inverted /\ dipole at 7m high to the centre and sloping to 6m to the ends, it becomes pretty much omni directional with a total gain (including ground reflected) of 5dBi at 19 degrees, with a significant second lobe with a maximum of 5.5dBi gain at 90 degrees (vertical to you and me).
If you make it a flat V at 7m high then the max gain is towards and away from the centre of the V with a maximum of 7.02dBi total gain, however if we move the antenna to a full wavelength high the pattern gets distorted again, with a significant second lobe and more omnidirectional.

Please bear in mind my limited modelling skills and my calculations could be full of errors, however I don't think they are too far from the mark ;)
 
Antenna height is the biggy when talking about dipole directionality. Even at a wave length, there won't be huge gobs of that directionality, but the radiation pattern will -tend- to be at right angles to the antenna, the lesser amount off of the ends of the thing. Those 'nulls' are also sort of misleading, there's still signal being radiated, just not as much as off of the 'sides'. At lower heights the radiation pattern tends to be omnidirectional. Maybe a 'wide oval' sort of shape as the antenna nears that 1 wave length height.
None of those radiation patterns are ever going to be as 'regular' or nicely shaped as the classical examples you see in books/web sites. Anything/everything around that antenna is going to have some affect on that radiation pattern's shape. Probably not much, but it can get sort of weird looking.
Inverted 'V' antennas are still a typical 1/2 wave dipole. They act like one, and very seldom get very directional. That's mainly because they are typically used because of limited space. The biggest benefit to them is that "less space" to put them up in, and the angle between the legs of them does contribute to an impedance match to 50 ohms. As the angle between those legs get's smaller, the input impedance drops from a typical 70-75 ohms to something closer to 50 ohms. Varying that 'angle of the dangle' is one way of adjusting impedance matching without affecting resonance too much.
If you want a single multiband antenna then the two things that will affect things the most is the overall length and what you use for a feed line. A center fed doublet at the lowest band of interest will typically work on the 'odd' harmonically related bands (not so good on the 'even' harmonics) -higher- in frequency from the primary band of resonance. That just means that the 'bigger the better' to some ridiculous extent.
The two most common feed lines used are coax and 'ladder-line'. Each have their pluses and minuses. The biggy is that ladder-line can withstand a much higher SWR before it's affected much. Coax has a much smaller SWR 'range' before it's damaged. Use the one that's least affected by being off frequency for the best results. Depending on the non-resonant frequency, the input impedance can be all over the place! So, using a tuner at the transmitter end is very common. The 'limit' to that is the amount of 'system' impedance mismatch the tuner can handle, AND the amount of SWR the feed line can withstand without being destroyed. Of the two types, coax and ladder-line, the ladder-line will win that 'game' every time. While having a multiband single antenna is 'good' (fewer antennas) you also have to keep in mind that it's radiation pattern will change drastically with each band change. It will radiate a signal, but there's really no predicting where/how that signal will go without modeling the thing with every variable accounted for. If you are 'happy' with where/how the thing performs, good. If not, then change it's shape or positioning. How do you tell? Try it and see!
All of the above are generalizations, nothing real specific.
- 'Doc
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • @ Mark Malcomb:
    Hello BJ. Been a long time since I've been on. You doing well? Mark Malcomb
  • @ Naysayer:
    I’m
  • @ kingmudduck:
    Hello to all I have a cobra 138xlr, Looking for the number display for it. try a 4233 and it did not work