-
You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
FCC Cites Washington Resident for Causing Interference on Amateur Frequencies
- Thread starter ARRL
- Start date
I guess I have two questions on this one:
What is this "apparent lighting device" they mention (they don't clarify that)? Was this "lighting device" legally purchased from a brick-and-mortar store?
Isn't a $16,000 per day fine a bit (okay, very much) excessive?
I can understand the FCC's frustration that the resident hasn't responded (in writing) to them, but why haven't they knocked on the individual's door and attempted to resolve the situation? They sure as hell do if it's determined that a radio transmitter is the issue.
Sorry, but there are too many things not mentioned in this article.
What is this "apparent lighting device" they mention (they don't clarify that)? Was this "lighting device" legally purchased from a brick-and-mortar store?
Isn't a $16,000 per day fine a bit (okay, very much) excessive?
I can understand the FCC's frustration that the resident hasn't responded (in writing) to them, but why haven't they knocked on the individual's door and attempted to resolve the situation? They sure as hell do if it's determined that a radio transmitter is the issue.
Sorry, but there are too many things not mentioned in this article.