Some of us know there is no such thing as a 1:1:1 SWR.![]()
Ok,I can see your point there. A properly tuned and efficient antenna system is what I meant. A 1:5:1 ratio is not acceptable to me.
Some of us know there is no such thing as a 1:1:1 SWR.![]()
This is what I was looking at, and it's not a solid core conductor,
LMR-400 Low Loss Coax Cable - w/ 10AWG Stranded Center Conductor - VETCO.NET
Ok,I can see your point there. A properly tuned and efficient antenna system is what I meant. A 1:5:1 ratio is not acceptable to me.
ebay style ad:
This is an LMR-400 Equivalent Coaxial Cable,,
LMR | Times Microwave
also for that price you can buy the real thing times microwave lmr400uf ultra flex stranded for cheaper than the fake stuff,
Yep, 2.5:1 is less than 1dB in loss.
You TOTALLY missed that. There is also no such thing as a 1:5:1. There is however such a thing as a 1.5:1 SWR. Take a GOOD look between the numbers.
If you find a 1.5:1 is not acceptable than you do not really understand what that really means. For one thing it means that 4 % of your power is being reflected........only 4 %. You loose more than that in an average run of decent quality coax cable. It is also unrealistic to expect anything less than that over the entire CB+Freeband. Introducing an antenna tuner will create more losses than saves if you are only trying to correct a 1.6:1. I hope you never operate 80 or 160m unless you have multiple antennas tuned in 50 or 100 KHz segments of the band. LOL![]()
Hard to go wrong with either Belden or Times Microwave. Personally those are the only brands I would buy unless I was going with heliax.
Right - if it doesn't have a solid center conductor, it ISN'T LMR-400®. It might be LMR-400XF® (note the suffix).
LMR-400® and other LMR® cables is manufactured ONLY by Times Microwave. No matter how much other manufacturers try to stretch reality, the fact remains that whatever they make, it's an imitation of the real thing. Might be as good - but if it fails, the manufacturer might not stand behind the product.