• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.

Need QUAD Expert for Spacing of elements

xm49north7

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2019
303
475
73
61
Ok, I am building a 2 element quad for 11 meters. I have checked many building plans, and many online calculators. None of them agree. For the spacing between driven element and reflector, I get everything from 3 feet to 5 feet to 8 feet, I get a number saying 62 inches and 63 inches, 67 inches. Some say longer the better for gain ,I would welcome any experience, thoughts, modeling info. I have most of my parts made, just deciding on boom length to start with, more interested in gain, than front to back, as where I live in rural area, there is no back traffic at all. Majority of my contacts are in a south to west zone. Thank you in advance, for those who wish to jot down there thoughts. I am using 27.200 mhz for my calculations (channel 20) Also this will be a quagy design, my loops are aprox. 6 feet wide by 12 feet tall, made from #14 stranded copper wire and driven is middle side fed, for vertical polarization. This will be top hung from a wood boom, On a wood pole. at 30 feet to the top boom to start .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Shadetree Mechanic

A quad is fairly forgiving for element spacing. Gain will vary very slightly with reasonable changes in spacing. Mmost of the time spacing can be varied to obtain a better match without compromising gain much at all. Look at the spacing 9f a commercial quad and copy it. They already did the math to the n'th degree on it.
 
But why such big difs, even in manufactured quads, anywhere from 3 feet to 8 feet?? for 2 el quad. 5 feet seems to be the most common. I am think of starting at around 6 feet 5 inch, spacing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: midnight special
http://www.cubexquads.com/CB.htm
MAGNUM-2CB 11 Meter 2 Element Quad
  • 9+ dBi gain @ 40 FT.; F/B >23dB
  • 1 MHz Bandwidth - 2:1 VSWR
  • Rugged fiberglass spreader arm construction
  • 1.75" Aluminum Boom, 59" long
  • 1/4w 75 ohm Matching Section included
  • All-weather construction
  • Handles full Legal Limit Power
  • Small size, big performance; weighs just 26 lbs.
  • Turning radius - 7.2 ft
  • "Diamond" configuration
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shadetree Mechanic
BJ that was a great read. I have yet to actually build a quad. I tried decades ago and it just didn't work out for me. I didn't know about feeding it properly then so my SWR was crazy bad. Now I just don't see how I could get a pass on it with my wife. Thinking though a quad at 2 meters would be fun.
 
But why such big difs, even in manufactured quads, anywhere from 3 feet to 8 feet?? for 2 el quad. 5 feet seems to be the most common. I am think of starting at around 6 feet 5 inch, spacing.

It depends on what factor is optimized. You can only optimize one at the expense or the other two and they are bandwidth, forward gain, or front/back ratio. Some maunfacturers like to try and make short booms attractive to people with limited space so they develop a short boom which would require slightly different element lengths. In all honesty I cannot even imaging an 11m quad with a 3 foot boom. That is only about half of optimal spacing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xm49north7
It depends on what factor is optimized. You can only optimize one at the expense or the other two and they are bandwidth, forward gain, or front/back ratio. Some maunfacturers like to try and make short booms attractive to people with limited space so they develop a short boom which would require slightly different element lengths. In all honesty I cannot even imaging an 11m quad with a 3 foot boom. That is only about half of optimal spacing.
All about the forward gain for me, do not really care about front to back, as there is almost zero local here, and no real noise sources at all, I am many miles from any town. So 6'5" sounds like the plan
 
Look at the diagram on page 20. The narrow spacing of .125wl actually has the Higher gain.
I may be missing something but to me, the wider spacing is more ease of impedance matching. The .200 to .25 wl spacing the impedance gets nearer to 50 ohms.
This said 6.5ft spacing is too wide for 11m for max gain.
CK/DB help me out, my calculation has peak gain with >5ft spacing. (?)
All the Best
Gary
 
All about the forward gain for me, do not really care about front to back, as there is almost zero local here, and no real noise sources at all, I am many miles from any town. So 6'5" sounds like the plan

The 0.1 or 0.2 dB difference is nothing. You will lose more in the coax cable. People tend to get all worked up over a fraction of a dB yet it takes a full 6 dB to make 1 S-unit difference in signal strength.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wavrider

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • dxBot:
    Tucker442 has left the room.
  • @ BJ radionut:
    LIVE 10:00 AM EST :cool:
  • @ Charles Edwards:
    I'm looking for factory settings 1 through 59 for a AT 5555 n2 or AT500 M2 I only wrote down half the values feel like a idiot I need help will be appreciated