Except for the 'design', or physical construction, there's very little difference. Some, sure, but nothing earth shattering.
- 'Doc
What's the difference between these antennas, except design?
I'm sorry, but that makes no sense because there is no top hat to a 'J'-pole. The transmitters used with those old 'zepp' antennas didn't have a 50 ohm impedance, which is the 'norm' for most modern transmitter. A 'J'-pole is not a typical 'zepp' antenna, but it is similar. There's a lot 'un-said' in that...
- 'Doc
A typical Zeppelin or Zepp antenna has a characteristic impedance of hundreds of ohms. It is not "loaded" at 10 or 20 or 50 ohms or whatever. You can use a matching network to present a 50 ohm load to the transmitter but the antenna is still hundreds of ohms....or more.
I took a look at that 'Blackbird' antenna and except for the long element having a 'take-down' connector in the middle of it, it appears to be the same antenna as was made by 'Arrow'. And since 'Arrow' company isn't around anymore (sold it) I'd bet it's from the buyer of the 'Arrow' company. That particular construction scheme has been copied a lot. And I have to think that's because they are simple, and do work well. They aren't the greatest things since sliced bread, but they certainly do as well as any other 'J'-pole.
I also wouldn't get to 'influenced' by TOA, that's hugely variable just from how and where the thing is mounted. They do work and that's the biggy.
- 'Doc