Sams PhotoFacts Collection

[danmcclain]

Thanks again Dan!

No problem...

 

[vswr]

Here you go.... Have fun... Dan

 

[vswr]

Hey Dan, I was trying to look closely at the pics and schematics of this post you put up but the compression of the JPG to PDF is so high that ehen you blow up the images, its way too blury to see. Is there a chance that you can redo this to a lower compression and larger file size so that the images will be as legible as the ones you've put up before?

 

[danmcclain]

Hey Dan, I was trying to look closely at the pics and schematics of this post you put up but the compression of the JPG to PDF is so high that ehen you blow up the images, its way too blury to see. Is there a chance that you can redo this to a lower compression and larger file size so that the images will be as legible as the ones you've put up befI've

I've scanned them the way I've always scanned them... 300 dpi. I wonder if it's getting worn out, I've scanned quite a bit in the past couple years.

 

[vswr]

I've scanned them the way I've always scanned them... 300 dpi. I wonder if it's getting worn out, I've scanned quite a bit in the past couple years.

300dpi is ok. 600 is way better for enlarging images. When you scan are you saving them as JPG or directly to PDF? Check the compression ratio. It could be set too high. Every other PDF I've gotten from you is much larger in file size and blows up perfectly even on my phone. These are very low quality. Try opening 1 of them up on your phone and blowing it up. You'll see what I mean.

I don't think your scanner is wearing out. If it was then the images would all be staggered or garbled.

 

[danmcclain]

300dpi is ok. 600 is way better for enlarging images. When you scan are you saving them as JPG or directly to PDF? Check the compression ratio. It could be set too high. Every other PDF I've gotten from you is much larger in file size and blows up perfectly even on my phone. These are very low quality. Try opening 1 of them up on your phone and blowing it up. You'll see what I mean.

I don't think your scanner is wearing out. If it was then the images would all be staggered or garbled.

I'll try 600 dpi... Saving them as PDF files. I'll check the compression ratio too...

 

[vswr]

I'll try 600 dpi... Saving them as PDF files. I'll check the compression ratio too...

Most likely the compression ratio when you save the file. On the average, your files have been around 5 to 10 mb. These were all around 1 mb or lower. Highly compressed. Makes smaller file sizes but takes all the detail out when enlarging which is what we need to do to see close up oarts and values. Thanks Dan

 

[danmcclain]

Most likely the compression ratio when you save the file. On the average, your files have been around 5 to 10 mb. These were all around 1 mb or lower. Highly compressed. Makes smaller file sizes but takes all the detail out when enlarging which is what we need to do to see close up oarts and values. Thanks Dan

600 dpi takes twice as long to scan a page and can't find a compression setting anywhere...

 

[danmcclain]

600 dpi takes twice as long to scan a page and can't find a compression setting anywhere...

I t just says standard compression...

 

[vswr]

600 dpi takes twice as long to scan a page and can't find a compression setting anywhere...

Yes. It takes lonnger. Let me show you what 2 different schematics look like when I blow them up. I'll screeshot them and putvthem up in a few. Theyvwill be blown upbto the largest size that I can do on my phone...

 

[vswr]

I t just says standard compression...

Here is a regular size and a blow up of the 132-135 you recently sent...

 

[vswr]

Yes. It takes lonnger. Let me show you what 2 different schematics look like when I blow them up. I'll screeshot them and putvthem up in a few. Theyvwill be blown upbto the largest size that I can do on my phone...

Here is a previous schematic you put up for me. Notice the difference when you click on them and blow them up. Maybe your standard compression is modifiable?

 

[pienari]

How about SuperStar SS-800 ?

 

[SuperLid]

How about SuperStar SS-800 ?

I don't believe SAMS covered any exports.

 

[danmcclain]

Here is a previous schematic you put up for me. Notice the difference when you click on them and blow them up. Maybe your standard compression is modifiable?

Some how the processing got changed from PDF to JPEG on the printer itself, changed it back to PDF. These files should work better...