• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.

Sams PhotoFacts Collection

Hey Dan, I was trying to look closely at the pics and schematics of this post you put up but the compression of the JPG to PDF is so high that ehen you blow up the images, its way too blury to see. Is there a chance that you can redo this to a lower compression and larger file size so that the images will be as legible as the ones you've put up before?
 
Hey Dan, I was trying to look closely at the pics and schematics of this post you put up but the compression of the JPG to PDF is so high that ehen you blow up the images, its way too blury to see. Is there a chance that you can redo this to a lower compression and larger file size so that the images will be as legible as the ones you've put up befI've
I've scanned them the way I've always scanned them... 300 dpi. I wonder if it's getting worn out, I've scanned quite a bit in the past couple years.
 
I've scanned them the way I've always scanned them... 300 dpi. I wonder if it's getting worn out, I've scanned quite a bit in the past couple years.
300dpi is ok. 600 is way better for enlarging images. When you scan are you saving them as JPG or directly to PDF? Check the compression ratio. It could be set too high. Every other PDF I've gotten from you is much larger in file size and blows up perfectly even on my phone. These are very low quality. Try opening 1 of them up on your phone and blowing it up. You'll see what I mean.

I don't think your scanner is wearing out. If it was then the images would all be staggered or garbled.
 
300dpi is ok. 600 is way better for enlarging images. When you scan are you saving them as JPG or directly to PDF? Check the compression ratio. It could be set too high. Every other PDF I've gotten from you is much larger in file size and blows up perfectly even on my phone. These are very low quality. Try opening 1 of them up on your phone and blowing it up. You'll see what I mean.

I don't think your scanner is wearing out. If it was then the images would all be staggered or garbled.
I'll try 600 dpi... Saving them as PDF files. I'll check the compression ratio too...
 
I'll try 600 dpi... Saving them as PDF files. I'll check the compression ratio too...
Most likely the compression ratio when you save the file. On the average, your files have been around 5 to 10 mb. These were all around 1 mb or lower. Highly compressed. Makes smaller file sizes but takes all the detail out when enlarging which is what we need to do to see close up oarts and values. Thanks Dan
 
Most likely the compression ratio when you save the file. On the average, your files have been around 5 to 10 mb. These were all around 1 mb or lower. Highly compressed. Makes smaller file sizes but takes all the detail out when enlarging which is what we need to do to see close up oarts and values. Thanks Dan
600 dpi takes twice as long to scan a page and can't find a compression setting anywhere...
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • @ 357:
    holy man no activity or what?
  • dxBot:
    357 has left the room.
  • @ Hambones amps:
    Does anyone know if you can replace the 2290 in a galaxy dx 93t twin turbine with a 2sc2879 red dot? If so, what would have to be tuned?