Search results

Are trying to discredit me in the same way that "wavrider". That this than that but those who do not put evidence, nothing, not even a chart, a map, a model, absolutely nothing, is you. Only words, only words, only words like a preacher. They say the 4000 VECTOR is an antenna "open sleeve"...

How strange is that if the old antenna VECTOR 4000 is as good as you say, the 2 meter Ham's not do, as it is very easy to do that antenna at that frequency, probably are dumb and have not discovered it..:unsure:

If you want to overcome any vertical antenna with some directionality, use the antenna in this manner. Just a single square. The polarization is vertical. After many tests with loops is the best configuration achieved. This is simmilar to a "hentenna"

antenna model does not distinguish between transmision and reception :unsure:

made to bend as the power required to break a 5/8 ?? with prayers and words?? the VECTOR 4000 is very good for: :whistle: unless a Firestik than a 3' !! the VECTOR 4000 is very good for:

"guy told me .." "tests already showed in 4nec2" I see no evidence, just words.

You look like a preacher. just words and more words. Can not refute a single argument of my past writings. And they are very simple, for that reason only uses words, since not help or math, or models, or diagrams, or drawings made ​​falsely. Just words like a preacher. Many says. "I really...

if you install the v-shaped dipole at 36'

evidence to "demonstrate" the performance of the Vector 4000 the drawings are absolutely WRONG, one phase "missing" . :thumbup1: When you start to accept for valid, erroneous data, no wonder then assigned properties and nonexistent fantastic real objects. PROVE IT ;)

One antenna as the vertical and the other angled beneath it as the radial; present this directivity to half wavelength high... (18' ) modeling using an real ground plane :thumbup: at 36' :thumbup:

They say the 4000 is an antenna VECTOR type "open sleeve", then show as an example this drawing.. In 1st place, the VECTOR 4000 is a mass power, as a J-pole!!! http://www.nevadaradio.co.uk/amateur-radio/antennas/base-antennas/sirio-new-vector-4000 (Type: 3/4 wave coaxial J-pole)...

CEBIK id dead?? R.I.P. I'm wasting my time on people who do not want to learn. :huh:

??????????? :biggrin:

LESS BAD I was tired ..

In 1st place, the VECTOR 4000 is a mass power,as a J-pole!!! not isolated. when it seems that the Vector 4000??* NOTHING! Second Cebik drawing shows that the coax cable is at the same potential, there can be two opposing currents in the same driver, would be canceled. Cebik The other...

is very simple, just apply as the whole antenna rf. You believes that only the piece of antenna you buy is what works. does not understand why. ABSOLUTELY ALL ELECTRICALLY CONNECTED TO AN ANTENNA INCLUDING COAX, IS PART OF THE ANTENNA.(And also induced parasitic elements) nosepc

CEBIK PUBLIC THIS?? http://www.cebik.com/content/a10/vhf/jp3.html the drawings are absolutely WRONG, one phase "missing" . :thumbup1: When you start to accept for valid, erroneous data, no wonder then assigned properties and nonexistent fantastic real objects. nosepc

from when a coaxial is radiant?? was invented to not radiate :bdh: Cebik publish this????????????? :scared::w00t: seems I'm the only one awake?? Nobody saw this before? <gotproof> :headbang:headbang:headbang:headbang:headbang:headbang

is a coaxial device, is what I say. is a device for operating a radiant, not a radiating gain is not obtained with the same. the drawing is wrong, because it shows both contrary currents. If the current time is positive, while it can not be negative. explain it. the drawing is...

The cone can not radiate in phase with the rest of the antenna, their currents are inverted and hence canceled. The Vector 4000 can not display absolutely free space gain over a dipole.* The SIRIUS VECTOR 4000 is a fed dipole at one end as a Zeppellin or J-pole antenna. For that reason...