Search results

Or at least the TVI victim won't know what locked the picture up.

OK Doc. Please post a link to a current Part 97 CFR rule which specifies mode bandwidth using numbers or even remotely suggesting a measurement technique to prove compliance. Teh thanks.

I'm still waiting to hear where Part 97 states BANDWIDTH "attenuation factors." Hams are supposed to measure this? They can't even look up the rules properly.

Some stainless hardware like the stuff Home Depot sells galls when you try to take it apart. Just as useless as a rusted piece only more dangerous because you have to fight with it up in the air. Try building an M-Squared 2 meter antenna. Lots of measurement and hand assembley. VERY time...

That would cure the oscillation.

Not to mention is has losses similar to coax, not open wire line. Run it with high SWR and watch power go bye bye.

Congratulations.

The bands are loaded with poor operators on all modes. Dunno where all those AM guys who don't know about their upper sideband are. I hope I never find out. I suggest you might want to let these guys know about this on the air.

Please show me exactly where Part 97 quotes phone BANDWIDTH numbers of any kind.

They also made a matching VFO for the 520 which was different than the one for the 520S.

My vote for sig gen is the HP-8640B. They can be had on ebay for a little over $100.00 if you are patient. There's even a complete maintenance page for these on the internet. I had some really high quality antique sig gens and the HP runs circles around them.

Unfortunately. Try setting up an analog TV modulator. Same fun.

Most every antenna at Empire has a backup which can be used while workers do their thing. Almost all antenna work is done overnight now.

But how do you know it's a TS-520S and not a TS-520?

Nice explanation.

Amen. That goes for pretty much anything else there too. Take it with a grain of salt.

I was waiting to see if the Jizz Motchey would keep up with a Moonraker. Then I'd like to read another dozen posts saying it's stronger in an ice storm by people who have never owned one.

That's a well thought out setup.

4:1 is correct for sinusoidal modulation which happens in the lab. Real audio usually isn't a sinewave. Another glaring error found in publications from an anti AM group in Newington.

The answer depends on the waveform, distortion tolerance and measurement devices.