Am thinking about replacing the usual vertical elements found in Buddistick antennas with a single 10' length of 3/4' Type M copper tubing.
A typical vertical Buddistick element is 9.4'. The slight increase in length won't make much difference. However, I think we can all agree that the copper tubing will be more efficient for these reasons:
1. Copper is more conductive than steel, brass or aluminum.
2. Telescoping and shockcord whips have several "connecting" points where loss occurs.
3. The 3/4" diameter of the copper tubing far exceeds that of steel or shockcord whips.
So here's my question. Will this gain in efficiency be worth fooling with? If so, I'll attach the tubing to a 4' wooden pole using hose clamps. Just beneath it I'll position a Buddipole Mini Coil (10-20 meters) resting on a typical CB mirror mount. The coil will be attached to the copper tubing using a very short copper wire. The usual elevated counterpoise wire will be used.
If the gain in efficiency is slight and a waste of time, I'll go back to watching Dateline reruns and Hallmark movies.
Jim
A typical vertical Buddistick element is 9.4'. The slight increase in length won't make much difference. However, I think we can all agree that the copper tubing will be more efficient for these reasons:
1. Copper is more conductive than steel, brass or aluminum.
2. Telescoping and shockcord whips have several "connecting" points where loss occurs.
3. The 3/4" diameter of the copper tubing far exceeds that of steel or shockcord whips.
So here's my question. Will this gain in efficiency be worth fooling with? If so, I'll attach the tubing to a 4' wooden pole using hose clamps. Just beneath it I'll position a Buddipole Mini Coil (10-20 meters) resting on a typical CB mirror mount. The coil will be attached to the copper tubing using a very short copper wire. The usual elevated counterpoise wire will be used.
If the gain in efficiency is slight and a waste of time, I'll go back to watching Dateline reruns and Hallmark movies.
Jim