W5LZ said:About the polarization of signals. They usually start out as the same polarization as that of the antenna.
Sounds good to me.
W5LZ said:That signal's polarization can be chnaged by reflection (change in direction) from the ionosphere.
Uh huh
W5LZ said:But since a signals poalarization is determined by it's most characteristic 'direction' as a 'whole'...
Huh? :welcome roll that by me again :?:
W5LZ said:the polarization of a 'skywave' tends to stay the same until the signal as a whole is reflected by something.
But that is what I meant. You don't know how many hops, or what the originating polarization was for that matter, but even if you did, I can't say that the H. beam from a thousand miles away shooting at me will be received as horizontal, can I?
W5LZ said:PS - What the "Ceeb" (Mr. Cebik) says...
I like to use his information as a good starting basis and I think it makes for good comparisons whithin his contexts. I believe most of his stuff is just modeled and not based on real world data, but that is true of just about everything there I have looked at. So, when his results say that a 4 element beam has more gain than a 3 element beam, that relative comparison is probably generally true in the real world too, although I would not expect to see the same absolute gain figures.