Yes, they certainly look (and are) fragile!
So if you're thinking about "jumping ship" from NXP - I also have done several winded messages about the discovery and new use of a device designed for something - only to find out that it's a close clone to a part that is ordinary and common.
They believe in the product - else they wouldn't have their jobs - so something's gotta' make this get a hook so it can sell...
They can try various ways - but the downplay of this is - the device can do this, but the OEM device already in there - doesn't give the new part any ability to perform so it seems to "fall flat".
So they go back to re-engineer a platform of support that makes the part perform better than anything else available in the market. Catch: it is in an idealized environment - it requires X and Y to make up for Z.
What gets hilarious is the changes from this "substandard part" subbed in - gives you this redacted result - moment. So that doesn't help to sell the item - so the sales department works with engineering and they put a few thingamgiddys to the whatchmacallit and add a few more "whatnots" and come up with a golly-gee Whizz Bang! and call it the next revolution in RF amplification.
If it looks like a bi-polar, works like a bi-polar - yes, it prolly is, a bi-polar.
But why all the extra support parts?
That is where it gets crazy and in light of the Zener and Isolation you'd need for the small switch - big load capacity moment - you can't have a bunch of engineering staff adding more horsepower to flea-powered small wattage device and expect miracles.
If you bailed out of NXP for mainstream - you will do fine - but as to refer back to what
@nomadradio said - be sure to pad the ratings a little higher to protect this part from failing and leaving the project stranded again.