• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.

Sirio 145 PL Mag Mount - Need New Coax - Advice

Uncle Charlie

Member
Oct 22, 2013
27
0
11
Coax is to short for my install :censored:, and I have read several post on replacing it - looks straight forward no problem,... now do I need to... figure out the Resonant Frequency of my antenna, and how do I figure that :confused:, so I can calculate the length of coax.
Sirio MegaWatt 4000 PL (Thank you m42duster...again), and I have read where The Mad Scientist replaced his coax for the Sirio 5000, and noted the Resonant Frequency for it was 27.025, then gave the formula to calculate the length of coax. Ok ..... how to compute the resonant frequency for my MegaWatt 4000 PL, or if someone can point me on the right direction ????

Now if you have read this far-- another question.
The Mad Scientist used LMR 240 Ultra Flex back in 5/11/12, but later 1/16/13 posted he changed to LMR 200UF, now both would suit my needs, .... I think, any suggestion's on the coax ????
 

And it should be the same for the lmr240, 17ft 4in. Hope this helps. This is for center of the cb band. 27.205. Hope tons helps.
 
Duster, I learn something new everyday sir. Sorry if I lead the poster in the wrong direction. I used this page when I set my system up,

Coax Length
This page puts the common misconceptions to rest about coax length !

Here are some viewpoints on Coax length, from people that know more about it than I do...

There is a misconception among CB operators that changing the length of your coax can "tune" your antenna system. This is absolutely untrue! This short discussion will detail why.

The coax cable is a means for transferring your RF signal to the radiating portion of the radio system. The cable, in theory, is meant to be a contained, non-radiating link. Because it does not radiate and serves only to transfer RF between two components of the transmitter system, it's performance in terms of efficiency is affected by length, but only in terms of overall resistance. In other words, using a long run of coax will reduce the total amount of signal at the antenna, but only because of loss due to resistance and NOT because of standing waves.

Ideally, you want to check the SWR of your antenna at the antenna feedpoint. In a perfect world, this is the best way. However, we all know that this is ludicrous to expect in a standard base antenna installation. Unless a remote SWR meter head is incorporated, we usually use the standard SWR meter located at the radio. The drawback is that resistance and slight impedance mismatch of the coax affects the overall SWR reading.

Because radio waves are tuned wavelengths of energy, we have to take into account the coax cable length. A typical 11-meter signal has a basic wavelength of 36 feet/wave. "Tuning" the coax for the exact full wavelength tends to throw off the SWR meter by not allowing any standing waves to return to the meter. Excess RF on the coax has been given an ideal medium by which to "hide" electrically from your SWR meter. That is not to say that the excess RF is not returning to the radio, you just can't see it on your meter.

What we want to do is create an environment where any excess RF (standing waves) are rendered as visible as possible to the meter. This is effectively done by using multiples of the 1/2-wavelength of the radiated signal. One half wave for the 11-meter band is 18 feet. However, this is not the length that you will cut your coax. There is another factor that affects the length. This is Velocity Factor. The velocity factor is basically a term for how fast the signal moves through the coax. This factor affects the overall electrical performance of the coax and thus needs to be accounted for when determining the true half wave length

Here are the velocity factors of the various Belden coaxial cables:

RG-59 .66

RG-59/U (foam) .79

RG-58 .66

RG-58/U (foam) .79

RG-8A/U .66

RG-8/U (foam) .80 9913 .84

RG-213/U .66

Here is how to figure out your true 1/2-wave:

492 x (Velocity Factor) / Frequency (MHz)

For example, I want to figure out the true half wave coax length for RG-59/U (foam) on my home channel (ch. 33 - 27.335):

492 x .79 / 27.335 = 14.219 feet

Now add 14.219 to itself to determine your 1/2 wave multiples. Remember to use every other number. See the example below:

14.219 feet 1/2-wave multiple, 28.438 feet 1-wave multiple, 42.657 feet 1/2-wave multiple, 56.876 feet 1-wave multiple, 71.095 feet 1/2-wave multiple, 85.314 feet 1-wave multiple

and so on . . . .

Use only the lengths that fall on the 1/2-wave multiples and you will be all set.

Now in order to get the true SWR of the system, you have to throw away that 3-foot jumper cable for now. The SWR meter has to fall on a 1/2-wave point on the coax run. Using the example above, you need a 14.219 foot jumper from the radio to the SWR meter, and a 1/2-wave multiple length from the SWR meter to the antenna. If my antenna is 65 feet away from my radio, I need a 14.219 foot jumper from the radio to the SWR meter, and a 71.095 foot length between the SWR meter and the antenna.

In laymans terms, the coax length fools your SWR meter into thinking that your SWR is different to what it actually is !

The ONLY way to know what your SWR actually is, is to use a correct length of coax for the operating frequency

This article was provided to me by Firebreather, Thanks.

Visit his web site

UPDATE 22nd March 2000

I have since discovered this information, which I thought may be of interest to some people who want to know more about the calculations involved.

Since we know the signal makes a half a cycle every 18 feet as it travels through the air on CB frequencies, we can come up with a formula (using simple algebra) to give us the exact length of a 1/2 wavelength for any frequency.

(Channel 33 = 27.335Mhz)

(18 Feet = 1/2 wavelength)

27.335 X 18 = 492 <- There is where 492 comes from.

492 comes from multipling the frequency by the distance of a 1/2 wavelength.

Also here is a second formula for calculating a half wavelenght in inches

5904 / Frequency = 1/2 wavelength in inches.

This infomation was given to me by Scott (not me, another one)

Visit his web site

Important info about wavelength!

Your math says a 1/2 wave antenna for CB is 18 feet. That is an error. The CB band in the USA is 26.965 to 27.405 MHz . The center is ch.20 or 27.205 MHz. Cutting an antenna to 18 feet would be a perfect 1/2 wavelength at 26.000 MHz. 1.205 MHz lower than it should be.

To cut a 1/2 wave antenna for 27.205 MHz., take 468 divided by 27.205 = 17.2 feet. or 17 feet and 4 inches.

Your math only tells you what an exact measurement is in wavelength. But you can not cut an antenna that way. It will be too long.

Dave

(Also read Dave's comments on the Radio Math page)

Read this, it is very interesting !

This info was ent to me by Steve, thank you.

The SAME SWR ratio or measurement will be measured at ANY point along a feedline, regardless of the pyshical or electrical length of the feedline measured in feet or degrees (at the resonant frequency).

For reference, read Walter Maxwell's book named "Reflections" published by the ARRL a few years back.

It will dispell many myths about antenna systems, SWR, and the like.

Now, if for some reason your SWR changes with differing lengths in your coaxial feedline, then you've got common mode RF flowing on the OUTSIDE of the coax (braid).

To reduce or get rid of this unwanted RF, use a "balun" transformer or RF choke which would consist of several turns on a 8 in diameter form.

Once the RF is removed from flowing down the outside of the line, the real SWR mearsurement can be taken.

Read Maxwell's book!

Good Luck.

Steven, KZ9G

This was sent to me by Dave, thank you.

****************************

Any person who says that, "coax length has nothing to do with SWR's" has no knowledge or understanding of broadcasting. I have been in commercial and private radio broadcasting for 25 years, and it's time to dispel the myths about SWR and coax.

Your coax is a vital part of the antenna system and must be tuned for proper operation. Installing an SWR meter at the antenna will measure the SWR's (AT) the antenna, but not the SWR's (OF) the antenna. Even with the meter connected at the antenna, any change in coax type or length, will change the SWR reading on the meter. But it doesn't make sense to check SWR's at the
antenna, because the most important component -THE RADIO- does not see the antenna alone. Your radio is reacting to the entire antenna system, including the coax. Even if you were to set the SWR's at the antenna and make them perfect, the SWR will be different at your radio's end of the coax.

Coax not only has resistance, but it also has capacitance which changes with different lengths. Resistance (Impedance), determines how the transmission line and antenna match the radio's requirement to send the greatest amount of signal to the antenna. But capacitance controls which frequency the antenna is best tuned at. Changing the capacitance of the antenna system, will alter the frequency at which your radio sees the best SWR. Any component you add to the coax line, such as a meter, linear, or
even a coax switch box, changes both the resistance and capacitance. My own radio, a Kenwood TS-570DG, has an SWR meter built in to it.

I also use an external set of meters to keep tabs on my radio's performance. When I check the SWR's on the meter in my radio, It shows a perfect SWR at one frequency. When I check the SWR's with the external meters, they show my best SWR at a
frequency almost one full MHz lower. So which meter is correct? They are both correct. My external meter is reading a perfect SWR at Frequency (X). That is because the resistance and capacitance of the coax and antenna is resonant at frequency (X). But
the meter in my radio is seeing the addition of a meter and a 6 foot coax jumper. This changes the resistance and capacitance of the antenna system that my radio is seeing. It also changes the frequency that the antenna system is now resonant at, so the meter in my radio sees a perfect SWR at frequency (Y) 1 MHz higher. Both meters are telling the truth, but the meter in your radio is the most important one to use for SWR. The meter in your radio is reading the SWR closest to your radio's Final output transistors, and that is more important than the SWR at the coax connector on the back of your external meters.

The following is for use ONLY on 11 meters.

For 11 meter operation, use these figures to set up your antenna and coax.

SORRY! I only know the measurements in FEET. Convert them to meters if you need to for better understanding.

For base stations. Cut your RG-8/U coax in multiples of 11 feet. For example.. if you need 50 feet of coax to reach your antenna, use 55 feet instead. 11 X 5 = 55. Or 11 feet multiplied by 5 multiples equals 55 feet total. If you need 37 feet, use 44 feet instead.
11 X 4 = 44. What ever length you need, go to the next highest length that can be divided evenly by 11. Include all jumper cables in that length. Jumper cables should be cut to 6, 9, or 12 feet. Never less than 6 feet, or more than 12 feet. Example. . . If you need 55 feet of coax to reach your antenna, and you want to add a meter in the line. Use 49 feet of coax from the antenna to your meter, and 6 feet from your meter to your radio. 49 + 6 = 55. If you find that 49 feet is too short from the antenna, then add 11 feet to the coax from the antenna to the meters, making your total length, with jumper cable, 66 feet. 11 X 6 = 66. If later on you decide you want to add another device like a linear in the line, do it this way. Do not just add a jumper for the new device. Where your main coax line from the antenna ends inside your home, cut off 6 feet of the coax, and put antenna connectors on each side that was cut, and add your new equipment at that point. The total length of coax stays the same, and the jumper is also the proper length.
For set up on 11 meters in your automobile, use RG-8X or RG MINI coax. Do the same as I instructed for base station installations, except this time cut your RG-8X to 20 feet minimum. Do not use less than 20 feet. Even if you only need 1/2 of that length, still use 20 feet. The extra coax can be coiled up and put in the trunk or under the seat. If it is possible, try to coil the extra coax as close to the antenna as you can get it. If not, the trunk or under the seat is good. It will not cause any problems. A length shorter than 20 feet can cause RF feedback, because of the antenna being so close to the radio. Also, mobile antennas are usually 1/4 wave or less.
This causes more RF to travel down the coax to your radio. A coax length of 20 feet, and coiling the extra coax under the seat helps to stop some of that RF from feeding back into your radio.

I hope I have helped you better understand SWR and antenna systems.

Take care. Dave in U.S.A.

***************************************************************************
 
Use whatever length is needed to connect radio and antenna with a little left over for convenience.
LMR-240 is the same size as RG-8X, and LMR-200 is the size of RG-58. Both are 50 ohms characteristic impedance. Either will work just fine.
Just how short is the present run of coax? Using a double female connecter and enough coax to get to your radio should also work just fine. "But what about that horrible loss when using a double-female thingy?" Forget it, there isn't that much loss at HF, something on the order of a fraction of a dB. Certainly not enough to worry about.
"What about figuring that velocity factor for a feed line?" Unless you are doing some sort of phasing or timing with that feed line it just doesn't matter at all.
Lot's of myths about feed lines. They all originate from a lack of knowledge or misunderstandings. I like the one above about '11 meter' stuff! :)
- 'Doc
 
So it is a myth about the certain lengths.
I need to slap myself silly, I work as a cell site tech and we always cut coax to length, as in what reaches, not a pre determined length. Like I said I learn something new everyday, I used the length I posted as it's what I needed, and it works. Thanks for the enlightenment, now time to erase all the apps that state this.
 
222dbfl, the information that dave provided on the stuff you posted from elsewhere is not entirely true. I would follow Steve's advice, and if you can't find a copy of Reflections, Reflections 2, or Reflections 3 by M Walter Maxwell there is a freely available pdf file available called "Another Look at Reflections" that covers the first seven chapters of those books. It can be found here.

It is a good read, and I highly suggest it to anyone who wants to know the true nature of feedlines.


The DB
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Thanks everyone for the responses, I will save rang file now and have a read. Again, thanks and god bless to everyone.
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.