• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Retevis is giving away THREE radios for their 16th Anniversary! Click Here to enter!

TRIO TL911 - the amendment proposed by PA0FRI

Matadorul

New Member
Sep 26, 2026
1
0
1
63

Kenwood TL-911 – PA0FRI passive-grid modification – output power stops increasing above ~20 W drive​

Hello,

I am working on a Kenwood/Trio TL-911 amplifier with the original five 6LQ6 tubes.

I have modified the input/grid circuit following the PA0FRI TL-911 modification. The amplifier is now operating and the input matching problem I initially had has been solved, but I have one problem that I cannot explain.

The present configuration is:

  • Original 5 × 6LQ6 tubes.
  • RF drive is applied to G1 through the new passive input matching network.
  • G2 circuit remains as in the original TL-911, except that the G2 negative voltage has been adjusted according to the modification instructions.
  • G3 remains unchanged.
  • Cathodes remain as in the original circuit, grounded for RF through the existing 4.7 nF capacitors.
  • The original G1 capacitive trimmer has been removed.
  • The original resistor associated with the G1 input coil has been removed.
  • A broadband passive matching circuit has been installed between RL2-2 and G1, according to the PA0FRI modification.
  • The 4:1 transformer currently installed has been checked separately with a VNA. With a 200 Ω non-inductive load on the high-impedance side, the VNA measures approximately 55 Ω and SWR 1.15 at 6.9 MHz, with good broadband behavior.
  • Input SWR remains stable when RF drive is increased.
  • No ALC connection is being used.
I have also repeated all the relevant adjustments/calibrations according to the TL-911 service instructions, including grid voltage, static balance and instantaneous protection level.

The strange behavior is the following:

On 7.1 MHz, with a 50 Ω dummy load:

20 W RF drive → approximately 140 W RF output.

Increasing the drive above approximately 20 W does not produce any significant increase in output power. The amplifier seems to enter a very clear gain compression/limiting condition.

The same behavior was previously observed with the antenna/ATU connected, so I repeated the test into a proper 50 Ω dummy load and obtained essentially the same result. Therefore the antenna and ATU can be excluded as the cause.

One additional observation may be important:

With the G2 negative voltage previously adjusted to approximately −78 V, I obtained about 200 W output with 20 W drive.

After changing it to approximately −70 V, as suggested in the modification instructions, the output became approximately 140 W with 20 W drive, but the same limiting behavior remains: increasing RF drive above 20 W does not significantly increase RF output.

At this point I would like to understand whether this behavior is caused by:

  • the G1 passive-grid modification/input circuit,
  • the G2 operating point,
  • the TL-911 protection circuit acting prematurely,
  • grid current/loading of the five 6LQ6 tubes,
  • or another operating condition that must be changed after converting the input circuit.
Has anyone performed this PA0FRI modification on a TL-911, or worked with a similar passive/swamped-grid conversion using 6LQ6 tubes?

In particular, what measurements would you recommend to determine why RF output stops increasing above approximately 20 W of drive?

I would also be interested in the expected G1/G2 voltages and currents under RF drive after this modification, and whether any other TL-911 adjustment needs to be changed from the original service-manual settings.

73 and thank you for any advice.
DL1YO
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.