• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.

New thread to debate V-4000

nosepc

On Vacation
Apr 12, 2013
187
10
28
ARGENTINA
The cone can not radiate in phase with the rest of the antenna, their currents are inverted and hence canceled.

The Vector 4000 can not display absolutely free space gain over a dipole.*

The SIRIUS VECTOR 4000 is a fed dipole at one end as a Zeppellin or J-pole antenna.

For that reason they can not show a pattern of gain in a model.

If you have a model, so I do it public as public do I design models.

I've published several, you publish any we serve the amateur?

As proof that it affirms? with words of cars salesman?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

what did CEBIK mean when he said there was more going on in that design than was apparent to most people & that by folding the radials up towards the monopole a form of co-linear array could be created that could out perform a ground-plane,

i have already pointed anybody interested towards the arrl open sleeve article & skeleton sleeve fed monopole as examples of 3/4wave sleeve monopoles with in phase radiation from the lower 1/4wave,

lets look at what CEBIK tells us about j-poles,

http://www.cebik.com/content/a10/vhf/jp3.html

the claim from the j-pole camp is the sigma is a simple 1/2wave with no radiation from the lower 1/4wave,

here is the uniform omni pattern they imagine, its a close spaced wire j-pole with very little radiation from the lower1/4wave,

jp2-3.gif



but what happens when its not a close spaced wire j,
you get radiation from the short leg,


jp3-2.gif


and CEBIKS wide spaced model over ground

jp3-10.gif


notice the lob sided pattern due to radiation from the short leg,
its clear that there can be radiation from a radial sleeve just as there is in the open sleeve antenna and skeleton sleeve fed monopole contrary to what the j-pole camp parrot on forums,

its clear that that radiation effects the pattern in the direction of the short leg and that maximum gain is in the direction of the short leg

radiating currents flow on the outside of the sleeve due to imballance, we have antenna mode and transmission-line mode currents flowing in the lower 1/4wave and the result is some radiation from the sleeve that is in phase with the upper 1/2wave just like the open sleeve /ssfm and sigma4,
the radiation can be seen in shockwaves cst plot of the vector 4000,
the whole antenna radiates in phase as AVANTI claimed,

coax-1.png


the wide spaced j has one sleeve element, a direction of maximum gain, a direction of minimum gain, a front to back ratio and an average gain that falls between min & max gain,

the arrl open sleeve antenna has two sleeve elements giving a bidirectional pattern with max gain inline with the sleeve elements, are we starting to see a pattern/trend

the ssfm has 4 sleeve elements, it has an omnidirectional pattern with at least some of the benefits from the radiating sleeve,

http://k6mhe.com/files/ssfm.pdf

"but its a simple 1/2wave" is all they ever say/post,

not so, the in phase radiation is there for all to see in the cst plot shockwave obtained from sirio and posted for anybody interested,

make up your own mind, does the lower 1/4wave radiate in phase with the upper 1/2wave?
all we ever had from the j-pole bandcamp is "its a simple 1/2wave j-pole"
they have NEVER posted anything,



then we have a guy that doubts you can alter radiation angle,

i have posted what the arrl tells us happens with the open sleeve antenna when the monopole is extended,

lets look at what CEBIK says about the j-pole, is there a general trend when the monopole is altered in length?

jp-2.gif


altering the monopole length alters the phase relationship between sleeve and monopole, shortening the antenna has marginal effect on radiation angle so long as sleeve dimensions are adjusted for a good match,

lengthening the monopole longer than 3/4wave causes high angle radiation and less gain on the horizon just like the arrl claim for the open sleeve antenna,

the sigma/vector gamma allows many different length ratios to be tested with a good vswr without having to respace/alter the length of the sleeve to obtain a good vswr

jp4-3.gif

jp4-2.gif


we can only guess what the actual monopole electrical length is as the sleeve raises the resonant frequency,

it was my opinion based on experimental tests that the stock old style vector was too long and the original sigma4 too short, i posted that 8+ years ago when i was ukmudduck and this debate started on the cb forums,

why did i end up a little longer than shockwave?, maybe because i had my vector close to the ground & his was elevated high above ground,

why did the engineers at sirio shorten the vector monopole and lengthen the sleeve?
they claim it gives a lower radiation angle @ the same gain,

why do some people claim their 5/8wave outperforms their sigma4?
because they don't understand how the sigma works or how to set it up for best performance,

i am still waiting for anything from the j-pole camp parrots.



73
Jeff
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
coax-1.png


is a coaxial device, is what I say.

is a device for operating a radiant, not a radiating

gain is not obtained with the same.

the drawing is wrong, because it shows both contrary currents.

If the current time is positive, while it can not be negative.

explain it.

the drawing is wrong, it is a drawing, and I can draw things more beautiful.

can-stock-photo_csp7379726.jpg
 
Last edited:
"because it shows both contrary currents"

what does that mean in english? are you saying coax can't radiate due to common mode on the outside of the braid?
 
It's very apparent he is overlooking the fact that conductors can and do carry more than one current. He's seen the CST model that shows a difference in color between the inside and outside of the cone. He knows there is a chart at the top right of the model that shows exactly what that color means in both phase and magnitude. All this has done is cause him to go into denial and aggressively propagate the old J-pole myth about the antenna in several threads.

Every year or so we get someone in here that thinks they know how this antenna works and helps everyone out by telling them it's just a J-pole. The myth is even more prevalent outside of the USA. I found one forum in Greece where a member found his fathers old notes saying it was just a 1/2 wave J-pole and had changed the entire forums view on the antenna to believe his mistaken ideas.

Thankfully that can never happen here. This forum has access to the latest computer models. This forum has members with extensive experience working with the antenna. This forum has members who have conducted field tests with collinear phasing sections to identify the phase angle of the radiation coming from the stock antenna as 270 degrees or 3/4 wavelength.

We still will have some diehards who refuse to see the cones in phase color in the CST model and others who can't see the magnitude is significant enough to be responsible for the 2 dbd gain figures in the .75 wave version, even when the model currents on the cone are broken down into easy to view quarters on 4 radials whose sum of total current are comparable to the main vertical.
 
"because it shows both contrary currents"

what does that mean in english? are you saying coax can't radiate due to common mode on the outside of the braid?

from when a coaxial is radiant??

was invented to not radiate

:bdh:


Cebik publish this?????????????

:eek::w00t:

seems I'm the only one awake?? Nobody saw this before?

<gotproof>



:headbang:headbang:headbang:headbang:headbang:headbang
 
Last edited:
anybody that understands anything about coaxial cable knows it can radiate,
it is more difficult to stop coax radiating than it is to cause it to radiate,

coax is a 3 wire conductor,
the center conductor
the inner surface of the braid,
the outside surface of the braid


Coaxial feedlines, currents in feedlines and shielded wires <gotproof>

A Common-Mode Current Picture Show <gotproof>

NOTHING that you have posted since you joined the forum is how you believe it works, EVERY post you make is a FANTASY,

you need to stop arguing and start learning, this is getting beyond silly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
anybody that understands anything about coaxial cable knows it can radiate,
it is more difficult to stop coax radiating than it is to cause it to radiate,

coax is a 3 wire conductor,
the center conductor
the inner surface of the braid,
the outside surface of the braid


Coaxial feedlines, currents in feedlines and shielded wires <gotproof>

A Common-Mode Current Picture Show <gotproof>

NOTHING that you have posted since you joined the forum is how you believe it works, EVERY post you make is a FANTASY,

you need to stop arguing and start learning, this is getting beyond silly.

In 1st place, the VECTOR 4000 is a mass power,as a J-pole!!!

not isolated.

when it seems that the Vector 4000??*

NOTHING!



ShieldGround.jpg


Second Cebik drawing shows that the coax cable is at the same potential, there can be two opposing currents in the same driver, would be canceled.

Cebik The other drawings are poorly made, do not show the two currents, one is lost.

I see your only argument is to discredit me, but can not refute my assertions.

Just copy and paste things from other, many erroneous without being an engineer and just using common sense that even a fool can see.
 
Last edited:
I see your only argument is to discredit me, but can not refute my assertions.

Just copy and paste things from other, many erroneous without being an engineer and just using common sense that even a fool can see.

No No No NO.

We are trying to get you to see what you do not see.
Many here have built and used this antenna.
Many here are very educated and experienced in antennas, unless you spend time here to read you will never know this .
You read a few pages but not the whole thing.


Please open your mind, or all this is useless.

We are trying to help you to see something new, you refuse to learn.
There is no one more foolish as those who refuse to learn new things.


73
Jeff
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I think 'nosepc's biggest problem is language. There are subtle differences in any two languages that can change the meaning or the expression of an idea. That being said, I also think that he is 'bouncing ideas' around to see what other people think, which everyone does to some extent.
From there, it gets complicated. How currents are displayed is one of those complications. In the above pictures, those currents are 'simplified' to a huge extent for clarity. They aren't just on 'one side' of the conductor, they are on 'both sides'. (That's an over-simplification but it does give an idea of what/where a problem may be.) How those 'opposing' currents react, or displaying how they react makes for a very interesting 'simple' picture, which means that you either have a large number of pictures for one simple idea, or you have to take for granted that people understand what you are trying to show. Good luck with that! Or, RTFM...
- 'Doc

And for 'nosepc', RTFM means Read The "Furnished" Manual. "Furnished" isn't exactly what that 'F' means, but it's the polite way of saying it. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Surly Cebic looks down on this and smiles, while shaking his head and understanding the frustration of those who refuse to learn.
Indeed a wise Man.

RIP.

nosepc, there is no bad feelings here toward you, only the frustration that the minds can not come together and meet in the middle.



73
Jeff
 
No No No NO.

We are trying to get you to see what you do not see.
Many here have built and used this antenna.
Many here are very educated and experienced in antennas, unless you spend time here to read you will never know this .
You read a few pages but not the whole thing.


Please open your mind, or all this is useless.

We are trying to help you to see something new, you refuse to learn.
There is no one more foolish as those who refuse to learn new things.


73
Jeff

???????????

10.09_SP_SalesmanC1997.jpg



:D

salesman.png
 
Surly Cebic looks down on this and smiles, while shaking his head and understanding the frustration of those who refuse to learn.
Indeed a wise Man.

RIP.

nosepc, there is no bad feelings here toward you, only the frustration that the minds can not come together and meet in the middle.



73
Jeff

CEBIK id dead?? R.I.P.

I'm wasting my time on people who do not want to learn.


:unsure:
 
Last edited:
Actually you have proven that you can act like a disrespectful ass. You said you came here to learn but you've ignored ever opportunity you've been given. Just the thought that your ideas are more relevant than Cebik's or you think you have spotted errors in his work is almost funny.

You've been given enough time to post here that everyone who understands the theory behind this antennas operation knows your description of how it does not work is purely fantasy. The more you stick with this line of thinking the more you deprive yourself of learning the facts.

I also think there should come a time when this type of nonsense has reached the point where it's counterproductive and stopped. When someone continuously posts inaccurate information and refuses to learn, their posts often contain enough misinformation to confuse those who are truly attempting to learn.

Your denial has placed yourself in a position where we cannot help you and you have become a distraction to the learning process of others. Now wave the magic wand over your fingers to get them to stop typing out false info. Then wave it around your ears and brain to engage them.
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • @ Wildcat27:
    Hello I have a old school 2950 receives great on all modes and transmits great on AM but no transmit on SSB. Does anyone have any idea?
  • @ ButtFuzz:
    Good evening from Sunny Salem! What’s shaking?
  • dxBot:
    63Sprint has left the room.