• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.

LOW PASS FILTER

To test a filter you need a signal generator to put a signal thru it and preferably an oscilloscope to look at the output to see how far down the signal is.

Captain, I assume to test a filter I would induce a signal from the signal generator to the input of the filter and connect the output to a dummy load with a sampler to the oscilloscope ?? then increase / decrease the frequency to see were the filter stops output??
Is a dummy load necessary with a signal generator??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain Kilowatt
Captain, I assume to test a filter I would induce a signal from the signal generator to the input of the filter and connect the output to a dummy load with a sampler to the oscilloscope ?? then increase / decrease the frequency to see were the filter stops output??
Is a dummy load necessary with a signal generator??

The load is not necessary to determine if the load is good to use safely with a TX but it will help determine the actual attenuation since it is designed for a 50 ohm system.
 
I tested the one I have and it started diminish the signal at 33 mhz and completely stopped it at 38 mhz on the low end it never diminished or stopped.
I know I am not using the proper terminology but I think you get the idea<GRIN>

Fun Experiment tonight...... Beats watching TV
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shadetree Mechanic
The following 3 images are of the BUD filter I redid this morning


20180926_040556.jpg 20180926_041405.jpg 20180926_042952.jpg Here is a quick rundown on some of the filters I have laying around. I read this post at 3: AM this morning because I was not able to sleep and ended up restoring an old BUD 601 and then decided to test all of the filters I have laying around on the Spectrum Analyzer. So below are the results of all three. The Blue one which is a CHANNEL GUARD XL-1000 was very touchy to get aligned but that could speak to cheaper construction and parts the BUD was very smooth and easy to tune after it was serviced and the DF4000 is one speed so what it is is what it is.

The DF4000 did have a lower cutoff frequency around 30.5 Mhz while the Bud was around 39 Mhz and the Channel Guard was right at 31.5 Mhz. They showed a pretty flat response -79 go -82 dBm from around 45mhz right up to 100Mhz

So this may shed some light on subject hope you enjoy now I must get back to work.

Please feel free to correct any errors as it was a long morning and I didn't bother to check my spelling LOL..20180926_040545.jpg



20180926_070058.jpg 20180926_070058.jpg 20180926_064711.jpg 20180926_064838.jpg 20180926_065224.jpg 20180926_065256.jpg
 
The following 3 images are of the BUD filter I redid this morning
20180926_070058-jpg.25432

Now that's a test bench any body could be proud of!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naysayer
I run one in my shack, seems to work ok. Although I have no real way to measure it's performance.
With it getting rough and tough going into this cycle, I'm thinking a 503hd behind either the original 5555N or one of my other lower power radios. The radio's are all clean but sure don't want any problems with neighbors and the reason asking about the df3000.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shadetree Mechanic

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.