• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • A Winner has been selected for the 2025 Radioddity Cyber Monday giveaway! Click Here to see who won!

SWR Mystery

Yes. I’m good with the numbers. Not one who goes nits to get a 1:1.

Was just curious of the numbers being reversed at two points 6’ apart. (3’ jumper from radio to amp and another 3’ jumper from the a p to the SWR meter.)

Boy this could go in many different directions
  • - Can a Chameleon change it's colors? Just don't ask it to do Plaid! :)
But now we have a better answer to this...

Ok, it's not really too bad, but your reversal - knowing now that you're running an AMP - changes a few aspects, but again - your match SWR is not too terrible so take this as some info on what you're encountering...

Ok, your SWR meter - and where it's positioned in line - AFTER the Amp, it senses a slight mismatch...
SWR at SWR meter:
1.6 on CH 1
1.1 on CH 40
  • The Antenna APPEARS longer - an Inductive factor
Then Positioned BEFORE the amp - between the RADIO and AMP - gives us this...
SWR at radio:
1.1 on CH 1
1.6 on CH 40
  • The Antenna now appears SHORTER - a Capacitive factor

So then, to answer this question...

Shouldn’t they be close to the same?

I am glad this came up...

So the only other question I have to ask you to help solve this and give a real world true answer - requires you to remove the amp and check SWR with Meter setup the same way in the other two tests - Radio thru 3 foot jumper to Meter then onto THE ANTENNA - what is the SWR?

If the SWR is in between the two - you just have a minor mis-match between the amp and the radio - affecting the SWR overall in the system - although not a big deal here it does help. Because this info - can help ANY tech in putting the right parts into the amp to cancel out the SWR bumps effects caused by input mis-match.

Here I am building up to a great answer and then this...
Added 12’ to my coax and problem went away. All’s good now. :D

"...If any of your operatives are caught or killed, the Secretary will Disavow any knowledge of your actions...
WOW...

Sigh...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redbeard U812
Boy this could go in many different directions
  • - Can a Chameleon change it's colors? Just don't ask it to do Plaid! :)
But now we have a better answer to this...

Ok, it's not really too bad, but your reversal - knowing now that you're running an AMP - changes a few aspects, but again - your match SWR is not too terrible so take this as some info on what you're encountering...

Ok, your SWR meter - and where it's positioned in line - AFTER the Amp, it senses a slight mismatch...

  • The Antenna APPEARS longer - an Inductive factor
Then Positioned BEFORE the amp - between the RADIO and AMP - gives us this...

  • The Antenna now appears SHORTER - a Capacitive factor

So then, to answer this question...



I am glad this came up...

So the only other question I have to ask you to help solve this and give a real world true answer - requires you to remove the amp and check SWR with Meter setup the same way in the other two tests - Radio thru 3 foot jumper to Meter then onto THE ANTENNA - what is the SWR?

If the SWR is in between the two - you just have a minor mis-match between the amp and the radio - affecting the SWR overall in the system - although not a big deal here it does help. Because this info - can help ANY tech in putting the right parts into the amp to cancel out the SWR bumps effects caused by input mis-match.

Here I am building up to a great answer and then this...


"...If any of your operatives are caught or killed, the Secretary will Disavow any knowledge of your actions...
WOW...

Sigh...

:D

The reversals went away. The SWR’s at the radio are slightly lower overall than the ones at the meter now, but are no longer polar opposites.

At radio:
1:26 on CH 1
1.07 on Ch 20
1.22 on Ch 40

At the meter:
1.34 on CH 1
1.20 on CH 20
1.31 on CH 40
 
Now its acting as it should,
extending the coax gives you the same curve with a little lower vswr,
when you see significant change adding a 6ft or any other length short jumper you have cmc on the coax or you added a very lossy jumper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The DB and Riverman
Now its acting as it should,
extending the coax gives you the same curve with a little lower vswr,
when you see significant change adding a 6ft or any other length short jumper you have cmc on the coax or you added a very lossy jumper.

Forgot to mention the 12’ was used to make a choke. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
  • Like
Reactions: bob85

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.