If they can't pay don't they usaly put garnisment on all future earnings and tax refunds and the like?
Who Da' thought Kop would have that ? ..... Not Me !![]()
Once a FO (forfeit order) has been issued and payment is not made, the issue is turned over to the federal collection agency and is treated the same as any monies owed the the federal govt.
Bank accounts, income monies,...any current/future asset can be seized as payment.
Can they garnish welfare checks?![]()
Holding a landlord responsible for a tenant's violations of FCC regulations seems like quite a stretch. A landlord who is complicit is one thing, but I doubt most landlords would have a clue whether any illegal activity was taking place on premises they rented.
This is a typical FCC tactic.
When they have difficulty with enforcing through there own inadequate rules they try to find a way to " run around" the problem.
It has come back to bite them in the ass before.
By now most of you have probably figured out the I have little love for the FCC.
To me they are a government agency that fails to serve the public interest well at all and often just sell out to the highest bidder.
They listen little to those they should serve and listen intently to those that have large commercial interests.
$$$$$$$$$$
73
Jeff
When I was a kid, I saw an ad in the back of a magazine to make a device that made the noise that a coin makes when it drops in the pay phone slot. Haha Was Blue Box the one that made the call on the ringer circuit instead of the audio circuit or something?I haven’t heard of a Blue Box in many years. Lol. Back when the telephone system was all relays.